Determining the Modified Rankin Score After Stroke by Postal and Telephone Questionnaires

被引:57
作者
Dennis, Martin [1 ]
Mead, Gillian [1 ]
Doubal, Fergus [1 ]
Graham, Catriona [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Div Clin Neurosci, Western Gen Hosp, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
stroke; outcome; modified Rankin scale; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.639708
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose-The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is the most common outcome measure in large randomized controlled trials in stroke. We tested 2 postal mRS questionnaires and a telephone questionnaire to determine completion rates and intermodality agreement. Methods-We sent postal questionnaires containing 2 versions of the mRS to surviving stroke patients. One version, tick box, involved the patient/proxy ticking 1 of the 5 descriptions equating to mRS scores; the other, the simplified modified Rankin questionnaire (smRSq), included 5 questions with yes/no responses from which the mRS is derived. We performed a semistructured telephone interview to consenting respondents, blinded to postal responses, to assign an mRS. We compared the mRS obtained by these different methods. Results-We sent questionnaires to 343 of 356 surviving patients (96%) and received 225 responses (66%). The mRS could not be derived in 27 respondents (12%) and 10 respondents (4%) on the tick box and smRSq, respectively (difference in proportion, 8% [95% CI, 3-13]. One hundred three of 190 respondents (54%) to the postal questionnaire agreed on the tick box versus smRSq version (kappa=0.44 [0.38, 0.50]). Agreements between the tick box versus telephone and smRSq versus telephone were 57% (ie, 87/152, kappa=0.47 [0.40, 0.55], and 64% (ie, 104/161, kappa=0.55 [0.47, 0.62], respectively. Conclusions-In large studies where face-to-face assessment of mRS is impractical, a postal smRSq with telephone follow-up to nonresponders will achieve higher levels of follow-up than will the tick box version and also good levels of intermodality agreement with least risk of bias. (Stroke. 2012;43:851-853.)
引用
收藏
页码:851 / 853
页数:3
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Bruno A, SIMPLIFIED MODIFIED
  • [2] Improving Modified Rankin Scale Assessment With a Simplified Questionnaire
    Bruno, Askiel
    Shah, Neel
    Lin, Chen
    Close, Brian
    Hess, David C.
    Davis, Kristin
    Baute, Vanessa
    Switzer, Jeffrey A.
    Waller, Jennifer L.
    Nichols, Fenwick T.
    [J]. STROKE, 2010, 41 (05) : 1048 - 1050
  • [3] Functional outcome measures in contemporary stroke trials
    Quinn, T. J.
    Dawson, J.
    Walters, M. R.
    Lees, K. R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2009, 4 (03) : 200 - 205
  • [4] Improving the Reliability of Stroke Disability Grading in Clinical Trials and Clinical Practice The Rankin Focused Assessment (RFA)
    Saver, Jeffrey L.
    Filip, Bogdan
    Hamilton, Scott
    Yanes, Anna
    Craig, Sharon
    Cho, Michelle
    Conwit, Robin
    Starkman, Sidney
    [J]. STROKE, 2010, 41 (05) : 992 - 995
  • [5] INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF HANDICAP IN STROKE PATIENTS
    VANSWIETEN, JC
    KOUDSTAAL, PJ
    VISSER, MC
    SCHOUTEN, HJA
    VANGIJN, J
    [J]. STROKE, 1988, 19 (05) : 604 - 607