Determining the Modified Rankin Score After Stroke by Postal and Telephone Questionnaires

被引:57
作者
Dennis, Martin [1 ]
Mead, Gillian [1 ]
Doubal, Fergus [1 ]
Graham, Catriona [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Div Clin Neurosci, Western Gen Hosp, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
stroke; outcome; modified Rankin scale; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.639708
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose-The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is the most common outcome measure in large randomized controlled trials in stroke. We tested 2 postal mRS questionnaires and a telephone questionnaire to determine completion rates and intermodality agreement. Methods-We sent postal questionnaires containing 2 versions of the mRS to surviving stroke patients. One version, tick box, involved the patient/proxy ticking 1 of the 5 descriptions equating to mRS scores; the other, the simplified modified Rankin questionnaire (smRSq), included 5 questions with yes/no responses from which the mRS is derived. We performed a semistructured telephone interview to consenting respondents, blinded to postal responses, to assign an mRS. We compared the mRS obtained by these different methods. Results-We sent questionnaires to 343 of 356 surviving patients (96%) and received 225 responses (66%). The mRS could not be derived in 27 respondents (12%) and 10 respondents (4%) on the tick box and smRSq, respectively (difference in proportion, 8% [95% CI, 3-13]. One hundred three of 190 respondents (54%) to the postal questionnaire agreed on the tick box versus smRSq version (kappa=0.44 [0.38, 0.50]). Agreements between the tick box versus telephone and smRSq versus telephone were 57% (ie, 87/152, kappa=0.47 [0.40, 0.55], and 64% (ie, 104/161, kappa=0.55 [0.47, 0.62], respectively. Conclusions-In large studies where face-to-face assessment of mRS is impractical, a postal smRSq with telephone follow-up to nonresponders will achieve higher levels of follow-up than will the tick box version and also good levels of intermodality agreement with least risk of bias. (Stroke. 2012;43:851-853.)
引用
收藏
页码:851 / 853
页数:3
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]  
Bruno A, SIMPLIFIED MODIFIED
[2]   Improving Modified Rankin Scale Assessment With a Simplified Questionnaire [J].
Bruno, Askiel ;
Shah, Neel ;
Lin, Chen ;
Close, Brian ;
Hess, David C. ;
Davis, Kristin ;
Baute, Vanessa ;
Switzer, Jeffrey A. ;
Waller, Jennifer L. ;
Nichols, Fenwick T. .
STROKE, 2010, 41 (05) :1048-1050
[3]   Functional outcome measures in contemporary stroke trials [J].
Quinn, T. J. ;
Dawson, J. ;
Walters, M. R. ;
Lees, K. R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2009, 4 (03) :200-205
[4]   Improving the Reliability of Stroke Disability Grading in Clinical Trials and Clinical Practice The Rankin Focused Assessment (RFA) [J].
Saver, Jeffrey L. ;
Filip, Bogdan ;
Hamilton, Scott ;
Yanes, Anna ;
Craig, Sharon ;
Cho, Michelle ;
Conwit, Robin ;
Starkman, Sidney .
STROKE, 2010, 41 (05) :992-995
[5]   INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF HANDICAP IN STROKE PATIENTS [J].
VANSWIETEN, JC ;
KOUDSTAAL, PJ ;
VISSER, MC ;
SCHOUTEN, HJA ;
VANGIJN, J .
STROKE, 1988, 19 (05) :604-607