Assessment of the greenhouse gas emissions from cogeneration and trigeneration systems. Part II: Analysis techniques and application cases

被引：110

作者：

Mancarella, Pierluigi ^{[1
]}

Chicco, Gianfranco ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Politecn Torino, Dipartimento Ingn Elettr, I-10129 Turin, Italy

来源：

ENERGY | 2008年 / 33卷 / 03期

关键词：

cogeneration; emission reduction; energy saving; greenhouse gases; trigeneration;

D O I：

10.1016/j.energy.2007.10.008

中图分类号：

O414.1 [热力学];

学科分类号：

摘要：

This paper provides a set of specific examples to show the effectiveness of the trigeneration CO2 emission reduction (TCO2ER) indicator proposed in the companion paper (Part L Models and indicators) to assess the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction from cogeneration and trigeneration systems. Specific break-even analyses are developed by introducing further indicators, with the aim of assessing the conditions for which different types of combined systems and conventional separate production systems are equivalent in terms of GHG emissions. The various emission indicators are evaluated and discussed for a number of relevant application cases concerning cogeneration and trigeneration solutions with different types of equipment. Scenario analyses are carried out to assess the possible emission reduction benefits from extended diffusion of cogeneration and trigeneration in regions characterized by different energy generation frameworks. The results strongly depend on the available technologies for combined production, on the composition of the energy generation mix, and on the trend towards upgrading the various generation systems. The numerical outcomes indicate that cogeneration and trigeneration solutions could bring significant benefits in countries with prevailing electricity production from fossil fuels, quantified by the use of the proposed indicators. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：418 / 430

页数：13

共 20 条

[1]

American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), 2000, ASHRAE HVAC SYST EQU

[2]

[Anonymous], 2001, EUR ED TOOL COG

[3] Cogeneration: a regulatory framework toward growth [J].

Cardona, E ;

Piacentino, A .

ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (16) :2100-2111

[4] Environmental assessment of biogas co- or tri-generation units by life cycle analysis methodology [J].

Chevalier, C ;

Meunier, F .

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 25 (17-18) :3025-3041

[5]

CHICCO G, ASSESSMENT GREENHO 1, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ENERGY.2007.10.006

[6] Co-utilization of biomass and natural gas in combined cycles through primary steam reforming of the natural gas [J].

De Ruyck, J. ;

Delattin, F. ;

Bram, S. .

ENERGY, 2007, 32 (04) :371-377

[7] CO2 abatement by co-firing of natural gas and biomass-derived gas in a gas turbine [J].

Fiaschi, Daniele ;

Carta, Riccardo .

ENERGY, 2007, 32 (04) :549-567

[8]

FOLEY G, 2000, FUTURE ABSORPTION TE

[9] Hybrid systems for distributed power generation based on pressurisation and heat recovering of an existing 100 kW molten carbonate fuel cell [J].

Grillo, O ;

Magistri, L ;

Massardo, AF .

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2003, 115 (02) :252-267

[10]

Harvey L.D.D., 2006, HDB LOW ENERGY BUILD

← 1 2 →