Using parasites to infer host population history: a new rationale for parasite conservation

被引:116
作者
Whiteman, NK
Parker, PG
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Biol, St Louis, MO 63121 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Int Ctr Trop Ecol, St Louis, MO 63121 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S1367943005001915
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Only one of the 5000 extant louse species (Phthiraptera) and no species of flea (Siphonaptera), parasitic helminth (Platyhelminthes), parasitic nematode (Nemata), mite, or tick (Acari) is listed as threatened by the IUCN, despite impassioned pleas for parasite conservation beginning more than a decade ago. Although they should be conserved for their own sake, past arguments, highlighting the intrinsic and utilitarian value of parasites, have not translated into increased attention by scientists or conservation managers, at least by the standard of listing for protection. Here, the use of estimated genealogies and population genetic patterns of parasites to illuminate their hosts' evolutionary and demographic history is advocated. Parasite DNA generally evolves more rapidly than their hosts'. which renders it an underexploited resource for conservation biologists, particularly in cases where the hosts' genealogy or degree of population genetic structure is difficult to measure directly. Moreover, parasite gene flow may occur during host dispersal irrespective of host gene flow, revealing host movement through space and time. Parasite ecology and evolution may thus become another tool for the management of endangered vertebrate populations. This will result in the recognition of new host records, parasite species and cryptic lineages, which will help lift the veil of ignorance with respect to parasite biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 181
页数:7
相关论文
共 94 条
[41]  
HOETZEL AR, 1993, J HERED, V84, P443
[42]  
HOLMES B, 1993, NEW SCI, V140, P30
[43]   Primates and their pinworm parasites: The Cameron hypothesis revisited [J].
Hugot, JP .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 1999, 48 (03) :523-546
[44]  
Hugot JP, 2003, TANGLED TREES: PHYLOGENY, COSPECIATION AND COEVOLUTION, P144
[45]   Molecular evidence for cryptic species within Cylicostephanus minutus (Nematoda: Strongylidae) [J].
Hung, GC ;
Chilton, NB ;
Beveridge, I ;
Zhu, XQ ;
Lichtenfels, JR ;
Gasser, RB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PARASITOLOGY, 1999, 29 (02) :285-291
[46]   Genetic structure in natural populations of flukes and snails:: a practical approach and review [J].
Jarne, P ;
Théron, A .
PARASITOLOGY, 2001, 123 :S27-S40
[47]   The population genetics of host specificity:: genetic differentiation in dove lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) [J].
Johnson, KP ;
Williams, BL ;
Drown, DM ;
Adams, RJ ;
Clayton, DH .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2002, 11 (01) :25-38
[48]  
Jousson O, 2000, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V13, P778, DOI 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00221.x
[49]   FLUCTUATING ODONTOMETRIC ASYMMETRY, MORPHOLOGICAL VARIABILITY, AND GENETIC MONOMORPHISM IN THE CHEETAH ACINONYX-JUBATUS [J].
KIESER, JA ;
GROENEVELD, HT .
EVOLUTION, 1991, 45 (05) :1175-1183
[50]   Molecular evolution of Pediculds humanus and the origin of clothing [J].
Kittler, R ;
Kayser, M ;
Stoneking, M .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (16) :1414-1417