(Q)SARs for predicting effects relating to reproductive toxicity

被引:38
作者
Cronin, Mark T. D. [1 ]
Worth, Andrew P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Sch Pharm & Chem, Liverpool L3 3AF, Merseyside, England
[2] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Inst Hlth & Consumer Protect, European Chem Bur, I-21020 Ispra, Italy
来源
QSAR & COMBINATORIAL SCIENCE | 2008年 / 27卷 / 01期
关键词
developmental toxicity; expert system; (Q)SAR model; reproductive toxicity; teratogenicity;
D O I
10.1002/qsar.200710118
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
This paper reviews the current status of structure-based methods for predicting adverse reproductive effects in mammals. The methods described include (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationships ((Q)SARs), expert systems and the less formalised approaches of read-across within (chemical) categories. There are a number of problems with applying QSARs to reproductive toxicology notably the complexity, subtlety and sometimes ill-defined nature of the endpoints and lack of data available for modelling. A small number of ((Q)SARs have been developed for individual classes of compounds for well-defined effects. These are supplemented by expert systems approaches of all types [e.g. DEREK for Windows, TOPKAT, MC4PC, PASS, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) QSAR Application Toolbox] for a variety of endpoints associated with reproductive toxicology. By far the largest, and best developed, group of models are those for receptor binding effects related to endocrine disruption, in particular to the Oestrogen Receptor (ER) and, to a lesser extent, the Androgen Receptor (AR). Strategies to improve predictive capabilities for reproductive toxicology are suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 100
页数:10
相关论文
共 77 条
[71]   Ligand-based identification of environmental estrogens [J].
Waller, CL ;
Oprea, TI ;
Chae, K ;
Park, HK ;
Korach, KS ;
Laws, SC ;
Wiese, TE ;
Kelce, WR ;
Gray, LE .
CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY, 1996, 9 (08) :1240-1248
[72]   USING 3-DIMENSIONAL QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY-RELATIONSHIPS TO EXAMINE ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR BINDING AFFINITIES OF POLYCHLORINATED HYDROXYBIPHENYLS [J].
WALLER, CL ;
MINOR, DL ;
MCKINNEY, JD .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1995, 103 (7-8) :702-707
[73]   CoMFA and docking study of novel estrogen receptor subtype selective ligands [J].
Wolohan, P ;
Reichert, DE .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2003, 17 (5-6) :313-328
[74]   Comparison of estrogen receptor α and β subtypes based on comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) [J].
Xing, L ;
Welsh, WJ ;
Tong, W ;
Perkins, R ;
Sheehan, DM .
SAR AND QSAR IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 1999, 10 (2-3) :215-+
[75]   Influence of the structural diversity of data sets on the statistical quality of three-dimensional quantitative-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) models: Predicting the estrogenic activity of xenoestrogens [J].
Yu, SJ ;
Keenan, SM ;
Tong, W ;
Welsh, WJ .
CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY, 2002, 15 (10) :1229-1234
[76]   QSAR study of natural, synthetic and environmental endocrine disrupting compounds for binding to the androgen receptor [J].
Zhao, CY ;
Zhang, RS ;
Zhang, HX ;
Xue, CX ;
Liu, HX ;
Liu, MC ;
Hu, ZD ;
Fan, BT .
SAR AND QSAR IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2005, 16 (04) :349-367
[77]  
REV STATUS DEV ALTER