Results Provide Information About Cumulative Probabilities of Finding Significance: Let's Report This Information

被引:66
作者
Bliese, Paul D. [1 ]
Wang, Mo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
replicability; power; probability; POST HOC POWER; STATISTICAL POWER; STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT; REPLICATION; PSYCHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1177/0149206319886909
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Commonly reported statistics, such as the t value and p value, contain useful information about the cumulative probability of finding statistical significance based on the properties of the sample being analyzed. Unfortunately, converting t values and p values into this form of information is not intuitive and is often done incorrectly. We show how the bootstrap can provide a way to understand the cumulative probability of finding significance based on the characteristics of a specific sample and the statistical model being used. We also provide a simple way to estimate this probability from t values without having to rely on the bootstrap. Reporting sample-based probabilities can help promote robust and reliable research by conveying appropriate levels of uncertainty into discussions of results. We provide recommendations to authors, editors, reviewers, readers, and educators to help counter origination bias (i.e., how much a single-study finding should be viewed as solid or sacred) and other biases tied to misunderstanding the variability inherent associated with reporting "statistically significant" findings.
引用
收藏
页码:1275 / 1288
页数:14
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]   The State of Social and Personality Science: Rotten to the Core, Not So Bad, Getting Better, or Getting Worse? [J].
Motyl, Matt ;
Demos, Alexander P. ;
Carsel, Timothy S. ;
Hanson, Brittany E. ;
Melton, Zachary J. ;
Mueller, Allison B. ;
Prims, J. P. ;
Sun, Jiaqing ;
Washburn, Anthony N. ;
Wong, Kendal M. ;
Yantis, Caitlyn ;
Skitka, Linda J. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 113 (01) :34-58
[22]   Psychology's Renaissance [J].
Nelson, Leif D. ;
Simmons, Joseph ;
Simonsohn, Uri .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 69, 2018, 69 :511-534
[23]  
Nickerson R. S., 1998, REV GEN PSYCHOL, V2, P175, DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
[24]  
Rothstein HR, 2005, PUBLICATION BIAS IN META-ANALYSIS: PREVENTION, ASSESSMENT AND ADJUSTMENTS, P1, DOI 10.1002/0470870168
[25]   STATISTICAL POWER IN CRITERION-RELATED VALIDATION STUDIES [J].
SCHMIDT, FL ;
HUNTER, JE ;
URRY, VW .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1976, 61 (04) :473-485
[26]   DO STUDIES OF STATISTICAL POWER HAVE AN EFFECT ON THE POWER OF STUDIES [J].
SEDLMEIER, P ;
GIGERENZER, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1989, 105 (02) :309-316
[27]   Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations [J].
Shrout, PE ;
Bolger, N .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2002, 7 (04) :422-445
[28]   Small Telescopes: Detectability and the Evaluation of Replication Results [J].
Simonsohn, Uri .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 26 (05) :559-569
[29]   JUDGMENT UNDER UNCERTAINTY - HEURISTICS AND BIASES [J].
TVERSKY, A ;
KAHNEMAN, D .
SCIENCE, 1974, 185 (4157) :1124-1131
[30]   Moving to a World Beyond "p<0.05" [J].
Wasserstein, Ronald L. ;
Schirm, Allen L. ;
Lazar, Nicole A. .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2019, 73 :1-19