Pecking order or trade-off hypothesis? Evidence on the capital structure of Chinese companies

被引:92
作者
Tong, GQ [1 ]
Green, CJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Loughborough, Dept Econ, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00036840500319873
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study tests the pecking order and trade-off hypotheses of corporate financing decisions using a cross-section of the largest Chinese listed companies. The study is built on Allen (1993), Baskin (1989) and Adedeji (1998) to set up three models in which trade-off and pecking order theories give distinctively different predictions: (1) the determinants of leverage; (2) the relationship between leverage and dividends; and (3) the determinants of corporate investment. In model 1, a significant negative correlation is found between leverage and profitability; in model 2 a significant positive correlation between current leverage and past dividends is found. These results broadly support the pecking order hypothesis over trade-off theory. However, model 3 is inconclusive. Overall, the results provide tentative support for the pecking order hypothesis and demonstrate that a conventional model of corporate capital structure can explain the financing behaviour of Chinese companies.
引用
收藏
页码:2179 / 2189
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[31]   THE DETERMINANTS OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE CHOICE [J].
TITMAN, S ;
WESSELS, R .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1988, 43 (01) :1-19
[32]  
TONG G, 2003, THESIS LOUGHBOROUGH
[33]   BANKRUPTCY COSTS - SOME EVIDENCE [J].
WARNER, JB .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1977, 32 (02) :337-347
[34]  
Wilson, 2002, J BUSINESS FINANCE A, V28, P557, DOI [10.1111/1468-5957.00443, DOI 10.1111/1468-5957.00443]
[35]  
Wiwattanakantang Y., 1999, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, V7, P371, DOI [10.1016/S0927-538X(99)00007-4, DOI 10.1016/S0927-538X(99)00007-4]