'Technology transfer' and the research university: A search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration

被引:308
作者
Lee, YS
机构
[1] Department of Political Science, Iowa State University, 503 Ross Hall, Ames
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0048-7333(95)00857-8
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This article examines the emerging 'technology transfer' role US academics are expected to play in economic development, what specific roles they believe they can play in industrial innovations, and how they might go about collaborating with private industry. Based on a national survey response of approximately 1000 faculty members at research-intensive universities it concludes that US academics in the 1990s believe that they are more favorably disposed than in the 1980s toward closer university-industry collaboration. A majority of the respondents supports the idea that their universities participate actively in local and regional economic development, facilitate commercialization of academic research, and encourage faculty consulting for private firms. A majority of these respondents, however, refuses to support the idea of their universities getting involved in close business partnership with private industry by way of, for example, start-up assistance or equity investment. Of various organizational and motivational underpinnings analyzed from the data, two factors stand out as central to the current debate on university transfer: one is the perception of declining federal R&D support, which threatens the vitality of their research enterprise, and the other is the impact of close university-industry cooperation, which is likely to interfere with academic freedom - the freedom to pursue long-term, disinterested, fundamental research. A search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration is, therefore, seen as a balancing act between these two competing concerns.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 863
页数:21
相关论文
共 59 条
[41]   TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER AND PUBLIC-POLICY - LESSONS FROM A CASE-STUDY [J].
MATKIN, GW .
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 1994, 22 (02) :371-383
[42]  
MCHENRY KW, 1990, RES TECHNOL MANAGE, V33, P40, DOI 10.1080/08956308.1990.11670663
[43]  
MORGAN RP, 1993, ASEE ANN C 28 JUN
[44]  
*NAT AC SCI, 1992, GOV ROL CIV TECHN BU
[45]  
*NAT SCI BOARD, 1992, FDN 21 CENT PROGR FR
[46]  
*NAT SCI BOARD, 1993, SCI ENG IND
[47]  
*NAT SCI FDN, 1994, AC SCI ENG R D EXP F
[48]  
PAGET KM, 1990, GROWTH POLICY AGE HI, P344
[49]  
*PRES COUNC ADV SC, 1992, REN PROM RES INT U N
[50]  
*PUBL POL CTR STAN, 1986, HIGH ED EC DEV CONN