Mediating team effectiveness in the context of collaborative learning: The importance of team and task awareness

被引:167
作者
Fransen, Jos [1 ]
Kirschner, Paul A. [2 ]
Erkens, Gijsbert [3 ]
机构
[1] INHolland Univ Appl Sci, Ctr ELearning, NL-3001 KC Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Open Univ Netherlands, Ctr Learning Sci & Technol CELSTEC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Res Ctr Learning Interact, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Collaborative learning; Higher education; Awareness; Team effectiveness; Learning team; SHARED MENTAL MODELS; SITUATION AWARENESS; COLLECTIVE-EFFICACY; FUNCTIONAL ROLES; GROUP EFFICIENCY; SELF-EFFICACY; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE; COMMUNICATION; TRUST;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.017
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Learning teams in higher education executing a collaborative assignment are not always effective. To remedy this, there is a need to determine and understand the variables that influence team effectiveness. This study aimed at developing a conceptual framework, based on research in various contexts on team effectiveness and specifically team and task awareness. Core aspects of the framework were tested to establish its value for future experiments on influencing team effectiveness. Results confirmed the importance of shared mental models, and to some extent mutual performance monitoring for learning teams to become effective, but also of interpersonal trust as being conditional for building adequate shared mental models. Apart from the importance of team and task awareness for team effectiveness it showed that learning teams in higher education tend to be pragmatic by focusing primarily on task aspects of performance and not team aspects. Further steps have to be taken to validate this conceptual framework on team effectiveness. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1103 / 1113
页数:11
相关论文
共 99 条
[61]   Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? [J].
Martins, LL ;
Gilson, LL ;
Maynard, MT .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2004, 30 (06) :805-835
[62]   The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance [J].
Mathieu, JE ;
Heffner, TS ;
Goodwin, GF ;
Salas, E ;
Cannon-Bowers, JA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 85 (02) :273-283
[63]  
MCALLISTER DJ, 1995, ACAD MANAGE J, V38, P24, DOI 10.5465/256727
[64]   Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries [J].
Mohammed, S ;
Dumville, BC .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2001, 22 :89-106
[65]   Diversity in demographic characteristics, abilities and personality traits: Do faultlines affect team functioning? [J].
Molleman, E .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2005, 14 (03) :173-193
[66]   Selecting individuals in team settings: The importance of social skills, personality characteristics, and teamwork knowledge [J].
Morgeson, FP ;
Reider, MH ;
Campion, MA .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 58 (03) :583-611
[67]   Developing synergistic knowledge in student groups [J].
Mu, SH ;
Gnyawali, DR .
JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 2003, 74 (06) :689-+
[68]   The contribution of shared knowledge to IS group performance [J].
Nelson, KM ;
Cooprider, JG .
MIS QUARTERLY, 1996, 20 (04) :409-432
[69]   Asynchronous computer-mediated communication versus face-to-face collaboration: Results on student learning, quality and satisfaction [J].
Ocker, RJ ;
Yaverbaum, GJ .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 1999, 8 (05) :427-440
[70]   Resolving the empty core: trust as a determinant of outcomes in three-party negotiations [J].
Olekalns, Mara ;
Lau, Feyona ;
Smith, Philip L. .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2007, 16 (06) :527-538