Therapeutic drug monitoring for everolimus in kidney transplantation using 12-month exposure, efficacy, and safety data

被引:61
作者
Lorber, MI
Ponticelli, C
Whelchel, J
Mayer, HW
Kovarik, J
Li, YL
Schmidli, H
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg Organ Transplantat & Immunol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Osped Maggiore, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
[3] Piedmont Hosp, Organ Transplant Serv, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
[5] Novartis Pharmaceut, E Hanover, NJ USA
关键词
certican; cyclosporine; everolimus; kidney transplantation; therapeutic drug monitoring;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00326.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The aims of the current study were to determine whether therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) might benefit kidney transplant recipients receiving everolimus, and to establish dosage recommendations when everolimus is used in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids. The analysis was based on data from 779 patients enrolled in two 12-month trials. Everolimus trough concentrations greater than or equal to3 ng/mL were associated with a reduced incidence in biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) in the first month (p = 0.0001) and the first 6 months (p = 0.0001), and reduced graft loss compared with lower concentrations (4% vs. 20%, respectively). By contrast, cyclosporine in the standard concentration range had no impact on BPAR within the same timeframes. Most patients receiving everolimus 1.5 or 3 mg/d achieved trough concentrations above the therapeutic threshold of 3 ng/mL, regardless of reductions in cyclosporine dose. TDM simulation showed that just two dose adjustments would achieve median everolimus trough values greater than or equal to3 ng/mL in 95% of patients during the first 6 months. This investigation indicates that improved efficacy is likely when TDM is considered as an integral component of the immunosuppressive strategy of everolimus.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 152
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
[Anonymous], AM J TRANSPLANTAT S5
[2]
[Anonymous], AM J TRANSPLANT
[3]
Neoral use in the renal transplant recipient [J].
Belitsky, P .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 32 (3A) :10S-19S
[4]
Cecka J M, 1997, Pediatr Transplant, V1, P55
[5]
Effect of SDZ RAD on transplant arteriosclerosis in the rat aortic model [J].
Cole, OJ ;
Shehata, M ;
Rigg, KM .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1998, 30 (05) :2200-2203
[6]
Nephrotoxicity of immunosuppressive drugs: Long-term consequences and challenges for the future [J].
de Mattos, AM ;
Olyaei, AJ ;
Bennett, WM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2000, 35 (02) :333-346
[7]
Everolimus for the prevention of allograft rejection and vasculopathy in cardiac-transplant recipients [J].
Eisen, HJ ;
Tuzcu, EM ;
Dorent, R ;
Kobashigawa, J ;
Mancini, D ;
Valantine-von Kaeppler, HA ;
Starling, RC ;
Sorensen, K ;
Hummel, M ;
Lind, JM ;
Abeywickrama, KH ;
Bernhardt, P .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (09) :847-858
[8]
Maintenance immunosuppression: New agents and persistent dilemmas [J].
Gonin, JM .
ADVANCES IN RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY, 2000, 7 (02) :95-116
[9]
Long-term kidney transplant survival [J].
Hariharan, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2001, 38 (06) :S44-S50
[10]
KAHAN BD, 1982, TRANSPLANTATION, V34, P36, DOI 10.1097/00007890-198207000-00007