Effects of acute and chronic nicotine on impulsive choice in rats

被引:81
作者
Dallery, J [1 ]
Locey, ML [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Psychol, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
来源
BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY | 2005年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
nicotine; cigarette smoking; impulsive choice; impulsivity; adjusting delay; rat;
D O I
10.1097/00008877-200502000-00002
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Impulsive choice, or preference for small immediate reinforcers over large delayed reinforcers, has been associated with cigarette smoking. The direct effects of nicotine on impulsive choice in laboratory animals are unknown. We examined the effects of acute and chronic nicotine injections, and the termination of injections, on impulsive choice in rats. Five rats made choices between a one- and a three-pellet reinforcer in a discrete trials procedure. The delay to the smaller reinforcer was always 1 s. A computer adjusted the delay to the larger reinforcer until the pattern of choices reflected indifference between the two alternatives. We assessed the effects of acute and chronic nicotine (vehicle, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg nicotine). The latency to make the first response of the session increased under the acute 1.0 mg/kg dose. There were no consistent differences in the effects of acute and chronic nicotine on response latency and lever pressing during the delays between choices. Acute injections of nicotine dose-dependently increased impulsive responding. After chronic injections, impulsive responding was increased equivalently regardless of dose, and it was increased even in the absence of nicotine. After drug injections were terminated, behavior remained impulsive for about 30 drug-free sessions, and then responding gradually returned to baseline levels. The results suggest that increases in impulsive choice were not due to anorectic effects, response biases or changes in conditioned reinforcement. Nicotine may have decreased the value of delayed reinforcers. Chronic nicotine exposure produced long-lasting but reversible increases in impulsive choice.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 23
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Delay discounting in current and never-before cigarette smokers: Similarities and differences across commodity, sign, and magnitude [J].
Baker, F ;
Johnson, MW ;
Bickel, WK .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 112 (03) :382-392
[2]   Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers [J].
Bickel, WK ;
Odum, AL ;
Madden, GJ .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 146 (04) :447-454
[3]   Effects of psychoactive drugs on temporal discrimination in rats [J].
Bizot, JC .
BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 8 (04) :293-308
[4]   The effect of repeated nicotine administration on the performance of drug-naive rats in a five-choice serial reaction time task [J].
Blondel, A ;
Simon, H ;
Sanger, DJ ;
Moser, P .
BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 10 (6-7) :665-673
[5]   READINESS TO EAT - EFFECTS OF AGE SEX AND WEIGHT LOSS [J].
BOLLES, RC .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1965, 60 (01) :88-&
[6]   The effects of d-amphetamine, chlordiazepoxide, α-flupenthixol and behavioural manipulations on choice of signalled and unsignalled delayed reinforcement in rats [J].
Cardinal, RN ;
Robbins, TW ;
Everitt, BJ .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2000, 152 (04) :362-375
[7]   Impulsive choice induced in rats by lesions of the nucleus accumbens core [J].
Cardinal, RN ;
Pennicott, DR ;
Sugathapala, CL ;
Robbins, TW ;
Everitt, BJ .
SCIENCE, 2001, 292 (5526) :2499-2501
[8]   Impulsivity and rapid discounting of delayed hypothetical rewards in cocaine-dependent individuals [J].
Coffey, SF ;
Gudleski, GD ;
Saladin, ME ;
Brady, KT .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 11 (01) :18-25
[9]   Temporal discounting: Basic research and the analysis of socially important behavior [J].
Critchfield, TS ;
Kollins, SH .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2001, 34 (01) :101-122
[10]   Effects of d-amphetamine and ethanol on a measure of behavioral inhibition in humans [J].
de Wit, H ;
Crean, J ;
Richards, JB .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 114 (04) :830-837