Looking deeper into the soil: biophysical controls and seasonal lags of soil CO2 production and efflux

被引:114
作者
Vargas, Rodrigo [1 ]
Baldocchi, Dennis D. [1 ]
Allen, Michael F. [2 ]
Bahn, Michael [3 ]
Black, T. Andrew [4 ]
Collins, Scott L. [5 ]
Yuste, Jorge Curiel [6 ]
Hirano, Takashi [7 ]
Jassal, Rachhpal S. [4 ]
Pumpanen, Jukka [8 ]
Tang, Jianwu [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Riverside, Ctr Conservat Biol, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[3] Univ Innsbruck, Inst Ecol, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[4] Univ British Columbia, Fac Land & Food Syst, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[5] Univ New Mexico, Dept Biol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[6] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, CREAF, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
[7] Hokkaido Univ, Res Fac Agr, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0648589, Japan
[8] Univ Helsinki, Dept Forest Ecol, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[9] Marine Biol Lab, Ctr Ecosyst, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 芬兰科学院;
关键词
lags; moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS); photosynthesis; soil CO2 efflux; soil CO2 production; soil CO2 sensors; soil respiration; TEMPERATE DECIDUOUS FOREST; GROSS PRIMARY PRODUCTION; CARBON-DIOXIDE; GAS DIFFUSIVITY; WATER-CONTENT; TERRESTRIAL GROSS; ROOT RESPIRATION; ANNUAL GRASSLAND; RESPIRED CO2; PINE FOREST;
D O I
10.1890/09-0693.1
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We seek to understand how biophysical factors such as soil temperature (T-s), soil moisture (theta), and gross primary production (GPP) influence CO2 fluxes across terrestrial ecosystems. Recent advancements in automated measurements and remote-sensing approaches have provided time series in which lags and relationships among variables can be explored. The purpose of this study is to present new applications of continuous measurements of soil CO2 efflux (F-0) and soil CO2 concentrations measurements. Here we explore how variation in T-s, theta, and GPP (derived from NASA's moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer [MODIS]) influence F-0 and soil CO2 production (P-s). We focused on seasonal variation and used continuous measurements at a daily timescale across four vegetation types at 13 study sites to quantify: (1) differences in seasonal lags between soil CO2 fluxes and T-s, theta, and GPP and (2) interactions and relationships between CO2 fluxes with T-s, theta, and GPP. Mean annual T-s did not explain annual F-0 and P-s among vegetation types, but GPP explained 73% and 30% of the variation, respectively. We found evidence that lags between soil CO2 fluxes and T-s or GPP provide insights into the role of plant phenology and information relevant about possible timing of controls of autotrophic and heterotrophic processes. The influences of biophysical factors that regulate daily F-0 and P-s are different among vegetation types, but GPP is a dominant variable for explaining soil CO2 fluxes. The emergence of long-term automated soil CO2 flux measurement networks provides a unique opportunity for extended investigations into F-0 and P-s processes in the near future.
引用
收藏
页码:1569 / 1582
页数:14
相关论文
共 83 条
[41]  
Jury W.A., 1991, SOIL PHYS
[42]   Soil moisture variations and ecosystem-scale fluxes of water and carbon in semiarid grassland and shrubland [J].
Kurc, Shirley A. ;
Small, Eric E. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2007, 43 (06)
[43]   Sources of CO2 efflux from soil and review of partitioning methods [J].
Kuzyakov, Y .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2006, 38 (03) :425-448
[44]   Root functioning modifies seasonal climate [J].
Lee, JE ;
Oliveira, RS ;
Dawson, TE ;
Fung, I .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (49) :17576-17581
[45]   In situ comparison of four approaches to estimating soil CO2 efflux in a northern larch (Larix kaempferi Sarg.) forest [J].
Liang, NS ;
Nakadai, T ;
Hirano, T ;
Qu, LY ;
Koike, T ;
Fujinuma, Y ;
Inoue, G .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2004, 123 (1-2) :97-117
[46]   Temperature-independent diel variation in soil respiration observed from a temperate deciduous forest [J].
Liu, Q. ;
Edwards, N. T. ;
Post, W. M. ;
Gu, L. ;
Ledford, J. ;
Lenhart, S. .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2006, 12 (11) :2136-2145
[47]  
Ma SY, 2005, FOREST SCI, V51, P221
[48]   The human footprint in the carbon cycle of temperate and boreal forests [J].
Magnani, Federico ;
Mencuccini, Maurizio ;
Borghetti, Marco ;
Berbigier, Paul ;
Berninger, Frank ;
Delzon, Sylvain ;
Grelle, Achim ;
Hari, Pertti ;
Jarvis, Paul G. ;
Kolari, Pasi ;
Kowalski, Andrew S. ;
Lankreijer, Harry ;
Law, Beverly E. ;
Lindroth, Anders ;
Loustau, Denis ;
Manca, Giovanni ;
Moncrieff, John B. ;
Rayment, Mark ;
Tedeschi, Vanessa ;
Valentini, Riccardo ;
Grace, John .
NATURE, 2007, 447 (7146) :848-850
[49]   Response of the carbon isotopic content of ecosystem, leaf, and soil respiration to meteorological and physiological driving factors in a Pinus ponderosa ecosystem -: art. no. GB1013 [J].
McDowell, NG ;
Bowling, DR ;
Bond, BJ ;
Irvine, J ;
Law, BE ;
Anthoni, P ;
Ehleringer, JR .
GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2004, 18 (01)
[50]   Influences of canopy photosynthesis and summer rain pulses on root dynamics and soil respiration in a young ponderosa pine forest [J].
Misson, Laurent ;
Gershenson, Alexander ;
Tang, Jianwu ;
McKay, Megan ;
Cheng, Weixin ;
Goldstein, Allen .
TREE PHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 26 (07) :833-844