Contrasting effects of natural habitat loss on generalist and specialist aphid natural enemies

被引:2
作者
Rand, Tatyana A. [1 ]
Tscharntke, Teja
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Nebraska, Sch Biol Sci, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.15871.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The greater susceptibility of higher trophic levels to habitat loss has been demonstrated to disrupt important trophic interactions such as consumer control of prey populations. This pattern is predicted to break down for generalist species that can use matrix habitats, yet empirical studies comparing generalist and specialist enemy pressure in response to natural habitat loss are lacking. Here we examined the effects of landscape simplification resulting from habitat conversion to agriculture on nettles, Urtica dioica, their specialized aphid herbivore, Microlophium carnosum, and associated natural enemies that varied broadly in their degree of specialization. Both nettles and their specialized aphid herbivore were significantly more abundant in complex than simple landscapes. Different enemy groups showed contrasting responses. Aphid specialists (parasitic wasps and cecidomyiid midges) reached higher densities in complex than simple landscapes, and this effect was primarily related to shifts in local resource abundance (i.e. nettle aphid densities). In contrast, densities of generalists (coccinellid beetles and spiders) were significantly higher in simple landscapes, presumably due to spillover of generalists from surrounding cropland habitats. Natural enemy-prey ratios did not differ significantly across landscape types for specialist groups but were significantly higher in simple than complex landscapes for generalist groups, suggesting that enemy pressure on nettle aphids likely increases with landscape simplification. This was supported by our finding that aphid population growth rates were lower in simple than complex landscapes, and declined significantly with increasing coccinellid densities. Thus, in marked contrast to previous work, our results suggest that natural habitat loss may augment rather than disrupt consumer-prey interactions, and this will depend greatly on the degree of specialization of functionally dominant natural enemies.
引用
收藏
页码:1353 / 1362
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Effects of habitat destruction in a prey-predator metapopulation model [J].
Bascompte, J ;
Sole, RV .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1998, 195 (03) :383-393
[2]   Habitat edges and predator-prey interactions: effects on critical patch size [J].
Cantrell, RS ;
Cosner, C ;
Fagan, WF .
MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES, 2002, 175 (01) :31-55
[3]   Host-parasitoid extinction and colonization in a fragmented prairie landscape [J].
Cronin, JT .
OECOLOGIA, 2004, 139 (04) :503-514
[4]   ESOPHAGEAL ATRESIA IN SOUTH WEST OF ENGLAND [J].
DAVID, TJ ;
OCALLAGHAN, SE .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1975, 12 (01) :1-11
[5]  
Davis B.N.K., 1991, INSECTS NETTLES
[6]   Trophic structure stability and extinction dynamics of beetles (Coleoptera) in tropical forest fragments [J].
Didham, RK ;
Lawton, JH ;
Hammond, PM ;
Eggleton, P .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1998, 353 (1367) :437-451
[7]  
Dixon A.F.G., 2000, Insect Predator-Prey Dynamics
[8]  
Ladybird Beetles and Biological Control
[9]  
Dobson A, 2006, ECOLOGY, V87, P1915, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1915:HLTCAT]2.0.CO
[10]  
2