Teaching with evaluation in ants

被引:61
作者
Richardson, Thomas O.
Houston, Alasdair I.
Franks, Nigel R.
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Biol Sci, Bristol BS8 1UG, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Math, Bristol BS8 1TW, Avon, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.032
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Tandem running in ants is a form of recruitment in which a single well-informed worker guides a naive nestmate to a goal [1-8]. The ant Temnothorax albipennis recently satisfied a strict set of predefined criteria for teaching in nonhuman animals [9, 10]. These criteria do not include evaluation as a prerequisite for teaching [10]. However, some authors claim that true teaching is always evaluative, i.e., sensitive to the competence or quality of the pupil [11-13]. They then assume, on the premise that only humans are capable of making such necessarily complex cognitive evaluations, that teaching must be unique to humans. We conducted experiments to test whether evaluation occurs during tandem running, in which a knowledgeable ant physically guides a naive follower to a goal. In each experiment, we interrupted the tandem run by removing the tandem follower. The response of the leader was to stand still at the point where the tandem run was interrupted. We then measured how long the leader waited for the missing follower before giving up. Our results demonstrate T. albipennis performs three different kinds of evaluation. First, the longer the tandem has proceeded the longer the leader will wait for the follower to re-establish contact. Second, ant teachers modulate their giving-up time depending on the value of the goal. Finally, leaders have shorter giving-up times after unusually slow tandem runs.
引用
收藏
页码:1520 / 1526
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
ADLERZ G, 1896, Akademiens Handlingar, V21, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, HDB HUMAN DEV ED
[3]   The sunk cost and Concorde effects: Are humans less rational than lower animals? [J].
Arkes, HR ;
Ayton, P .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1999, 125 (05) :591-600
[4]   FORAGING RECRUITMENT IN LEPTOTHORAX-UNIFASCIATUS - THE INFLUENCE OF FORAGING AREA FAMILIARITY AND THE AGE OF THE NEST-SITE [J].
ARON, S ;
PASTEELS, JM ;
DENEUBOURG, JL ;
BOEVE, JL .
INSECTES SOCIAUX, 1986, 33 (03) :338-351
[5]   MODULATION OF TRAIL LAYING IN THE ANT LASIUS-NIGER (HYMENOPTERA, FORMICIDAE) AND ITS ROLE IN THE COLLECTIVE SELECTION OF A FOOD SOURCE [J].
BECKERS, R ;
DENEUBOURG, JL ;
GOSS, S .
JOURNAL OF INSECT BEHAVIOR, 1993, 6 (06) :751-759
[6]  
Camazine S., 2001, SELF ORG BIOL SYSTEM
[7]   IS THERE TEACHING IN NONHUMAN ANIMALS [J].
CARO, TM ;
HAUSER, MD .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 1992, 67 (02) :151-174
[8]   OPTIMAL FORAGING, MARGINAL VALUE THEOREM [J].
CHARNOV, EL .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 1976, 9 (02) :129-136
[9]   Social learning: Public information in insects [J].
Chittka, L ;
Leadbeater, E .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2005, 15 (21) :R869-R871
[10]   Teachers in the wild [J].
Csibra, Gergely .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2007, 11 (03) :95-96