Salicylic acid and jasmonic acid signaling defense pathways reduce natural bacterial diversity on Arabidopsis thaliana

被引:117
作者
Kniskern, Joel M. [1 ]
Traw, M. Brian [1 ]
Bergelson, Joy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Ecol & Evolut, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
microbial diversity; phytobacteria; Pseudomonas; Xanthomonas;
D O I
10.1094/MPMI-20-12-1512
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Terrestrial plants serve as large and diverse habitats for a wide range of pathogenic and nonpathogenic microbes, yet these communities are not well described and little is known about the effects of plant defense on microbial communities in nature. We designed a field experiment to determine how variation in two plant defense signaling pathways affects the size, diversity, and composition of the natural endophytic and epiphytic bacterial communities of Arabidopsis thaliana. To do this, we provide an initial characterization of these bacterial communities in one population in southwestern Michigan, United States, and we compare these two communities among A. thaliana mutants deficient in sallicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) signaling defense pathways, controls, and plants with artificially elevated levels of defense. We identified 30 distinct bacterial groups on A. thaliana that differ in colony morphology and 16S rRNA sequence. We show that induction of SA-mediated defenses reduced endophytic bacterial community diversity, whereas plants deficient in JA-mediated defenses experienced greater epiphytic bacterial diversity. Furthermore, there was a positive relationship between total community size and diversity, indicating that relatively susceptible plants should, in general, harbor higher bacterial diversity. This experiment provides novel information about the ecology of bacteria on A. thaliana and demonstrates that variation in two specific plant-signaling defense pathways can influence bacterial diversity on plants.
引用
收藏
页码:1512 / 1522
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   THE SECRET LIFE OF FOLIAR BACTERIAL PATHOGENS ON LEAVES [J].
BEATTIE, GA ;
LINDOW, SE .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1995, 33 :145-172
[2]  
BIRGIT R, 2006, CAN J MICROBIOL, V52, P140
[3]   Molecular basis of plant growth promotion and biocontrol by rhizobacteria [J].
Bloemberg, GV ;
Lugtenberg, BJJ .
CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY, 2001, 4 (04) :343-350
[4]   Signal crosstalk and induced resistance: Straddling the line between cost and benefit [J].
Bostock, RM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2005, 43 :545-580
[5]  
Buell CR, 2002, ARABIDOPSIS BOOK
[6]  
CAO H, 1994, PLANT CELL, V6, P1583, DOI 10.1105/tpc.6.11.1583
[7]   Host-microbe interactions: Shaping the evolution of the plant immune response [J].
Chisholm, ST ;
Coaker, G ;
Day, B ;
Staskawicz, BJ .
CELL, 2006, 124 (04) :803-814
[8]   RESISTANCE OF PHASEOLUS LINE WBR-133 TO PSEUDOMONAS-SYRINGAE [J].
DAUB, ME ;
HAGEDORN, DJ .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1979, 69 (09) :946-951
[9]   Three unique mutants of Arabidopsis identify eds loci required for limiting growth of a biotrophic fungal pathogen [J].
Dewdney, J ;
Reuber, TL ;
Wildermuth, MC ;
Devoto, A ;
Cui, JP ;
Stutius, LM ;
Drummond, EP ;
Ausubel, FM .
PLANT JOURNAL, 2000, 24 (02) :205-218
[10]   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE STUDIES OF PHYLLOPLANE BACTERIA FROM LOLIUM-PERENNE [J].
DICKINSON, CH ;
AUSTIN, B ;
GOODFELLOW, M .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1975, 91 (NOV) :157-166