The neck pain and disability scale - Cross-cultural adaptation into German and evaluation of its psychometric properties in chronic neck pain and C1-2 fusion patients

被引:29
作者
Bremerich, Friedrich H. [1 ]
Grob, Dieter [1 ]
Dvorak, Jiri [1 ]
Mannion, Anne F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept Res & Dev, Spine Ctr Div, Schulthess Klin, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
neck pain and disability scale; cross-cultural adaptation; validity; reliability; German language; C1-2; fusion; chronic neck pain;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c9107
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Cross-cultural adaptation of an outcome questionnaire. Objective. The aim of the study was to cross-culturally adapt the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPAD) for the German language, and to assess its psychometric qualities. Summary of Background Data. Neck pain and its associated disability represent an extremely common musculoskeletal problem. Reliable and valid questionnaires for its assessment are available in English, but no German versions of these exist. Methods. The English version of the NPAD was translated into German (NPAD-D) and back-translated according to established guidelines. Twenty-three patients with chronic neck pain completed the NPAD-D twice over 1 to 2 weeks, to assess its test-retest reliability. A further 80 patients [40% male, mean (SD) 54 (18) years] completed the questionnaire and underwent a clinical follow-up examination, 1 to 14 years after C1-C2 fusion. These patients also documented their satisfaction with the surgery. Results. Cronbach's alpha values (internal consistency) for the NPAD-D whole scale and for the NPAD-D subscales pain, disability, and neck-specific function were 0.97, 0.95, 0.97, and 0.87, respectively. The ICC for the test-retest reliability of the NPAD-D was excellent (0.97) and the SEM was relatively low (3.8), giving a "minimal detectable difference" for the scale of 10.5 (scale range is 0-100). The range of motion in rotation, assessed during the clinical examination, correlated significantly with the scores on NPAD-D item 16 (stiffness of neck) (Rho = -0.52, P < 0.0001) and item 17 (trouble turning neck) (Rho = -0.59, P < 0.0001). Range of motion in flexion-extension correlated significantly with the scores on item 18 (trouble looking up and down) (Rho = -0.60, P < 0.0001) and item 19 (trouble working overhead) (Rho = -0.45, P < 0.0001). The NPAD-D scores differed significantly between patients who were satisfied with the result of their operation and those who were not [mean values 36.4 (SD 24.3) and 58.1 (SD 27.4), respectively; P = 0.008]. Conclusion. The NPAD-D is a reliable and valid patient-orientated instrument for use in future studies of neck pain and disability in German speaking patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1018 / 1027
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]
Reliability and validity of the Hindi version of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale in cervical radiculopathy patients [J].
Agarwal, Shabnam ;
Allison, Garry T. ;
Agarwal, Ajay ;
Singer, Kevin P. .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2006, 28 (22) :1405-1412
[2]
Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness [J].
Beaton, DE .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) :3192-3199
[3]
Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Bombardier, C ;
Guillemin, F ;
Ferraz, MB .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) :3186-3191
[4]
Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: A comparison of different instruments [J].
Beurskens, AJHM ;
deVet, HCW ;
Koke, AJA .
PAIN, 1996, 65 (01) :71-76
[5]
Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain: reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the neck pain and disability scale [J].
Bicer, A ;
Yazici, A ;
Camdeviren, H ;
Erdogan, C .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2004, 26 (16) :959-962
[6]
Cronbach's alpha [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 314 (7080) :572-572
[7]
Sensitivity and specificity of outcome measures in patients with neck pain: Detecting clinically significant improvement [J].
Bolton, JE .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (21) :2410-2417
[8]
The Bournemouth Questionnaire: A short-form comprehensive outcome measure. II. Psychometric properties in neck pain patients [J].
Bolton, JE ;
Humphreys, BK .
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 25 (03) :141-148
[9]
NECK PAIN IN THE GENERAL-POPULATION [J].
BOVIM, G ;
SCHRADER, H ;
SAND, T .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (12) :1307-1309
[10]
Cohen J., 1988, POWERSTATISTICALSCIE, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587