Microarray versus conventional prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal carcinoma

被引:38
作者
Groner, RS
Peters, A
Brueckl, WM
Matzel, KE
Klein-Hitpass, L
Brabletz, T
Papadopoulos, T
Hohenberger, W
Reingruber, B
Lausen, B
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Surg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Med Informat Biometry & Epidemiol, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[3] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Internal Med 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[4] Univ Essen Gesamthsch, Dept Cell Biol, Essen, Germany
[5] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Pathol, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
gene expression; colorectal carcinoma; lymph node metastasis; microarray;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.21170
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
BACKGROUND. The authors investigated whether microarray-based gene expression analysis of primary tumor biopsy material could be used to predict lymph node status in patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Lymphatic metastasis strongly determines treatment algorithms in CRC. Currently, postoperative histology results are needed to determine lymph node status. Reliable preoperative information would be useful to advance treatment strategies. METHODS. in specimens from 66 patients with CRC from the Erlangen Registry of Colorectal Cancer, 41 shock-frozen samples of International Union Against Cancer (UICC) Stage I-II CRC and 25 samples of UICC Stage III CRC were microdissected manually, RNA was isolated, and gene chips (HG-U133A; Affymetrix) were hybridized. Prediction rates for lymphatic metastasis were calculated using conventional clinicopathologic parameters, gene expression data, and a combination of both. Prediction error, specificity, and sensitivity were analyzed using six different statistical classifiers. RESULTS. Analysis of conventional parameters produced a positive prediction rate that ranged between 53% and 61%, sensitivity of 42%, and specificity of 72%. Microarray prediction rates were between 62% and 67% for lymphatic metastasis. Specificity was between 76% and 83%, and sensitivity was between 38% and 48%, depending on the statistical procedure. The conventional estimates were improved by 9-12% when array data were added. CONCLUSIONS. Current data show that the prediction of lymphatic metastasis can be improved by gene expression profiling of the primary tumor biopsy, alone or in combination with conventional parameters. Gene expression profiling may become valuable increasingly in planning treatment for patients with CRC. (c) 2005 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 404
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]
*AFF, 2002, STAT ALG DESCR DOC
[2]
[Anonymous], 1993, Resampling-based multiple testing: Examples and methods for P-value adjustment
[3]
MUC-1 expression as a predictor of the curative endoscopic treatment of submucosally invasive colorectal carcinoma [J].
Aoki, R ;
Tanaka, S ;
Haruma, K ;
Yoshihara, M ;
Sumii, K ;
Kajiyama, G ;
Shimamoto, F ;
Kohno, N .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1998, 41 (10) :1262-1272
[4]
Birkenkamp-Demtroder K, 2002, CANCER RES, V62, P4352
[5]
SmcHD1, containing a structural-maintenance-of-chromosomes hinge domain, has a critical role in X inactivation [J].
Blewitt, Marnie E. ;
Gendrel, Anne-Valerie ;
Pang, Zhenyi ;
Sparrow, Duncan B. ;
Whitelaw, Nadia ;
Craig, Jeffrey M. ;
Apedaile, Anwyn ;
Hilton, Douglas J. ;
Dunwoodie, Sally L. ;
Brockdorff, Neil ;
Kay, Graham F. ;
Whitelaw, Emma .
NATURE GENETICS, 2008, 40 (05) :663-669
[6]
Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[7]
Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[8]
Bagging predictors [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 1996, 24 (02) :123-140
[9]
Tissue preparation for gene expression profiling of colorectal carinoma: Three alternatives to laser microdissection with preamplification [J].
Croner, RS ;
Guenther, K ;
Foertsch, T ;
Siebenhaar, R ;
Brueckl, WM ;
Stremmel, C ;
Hlubek, F ;
Hohenberger, W ;
Reingruber, B .
JOURNAL OF LABORATORY AND CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2004, 143 (06) :344-351
[10]
DeRisi J, 1996, NAT GENET, V14, P457