Radiostereometric analysis of the double-coated STAR total ankle prosthesis -: A 3-5-year follow-up of 5 cases with rheumatoid arthritis and 5 cases with osteoarthrosis

被引:22
作者
Carlsson, Å [1 ]
Markusson, P [1 ]
Sundberg, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped, SE-20502 Malmo, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1080/17453670510041583
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The designs of total ankle prostheses have changed in recent years in order to give better performance. Only a few studies of these ankle prostheses have been published, however, and none on micromotion. Patients and methods We evaluated 5 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and 5 with osteoarthosis, 4 (3-5) years after arthroplasty with the double-coated STAR prosthesis. Clinical examination included AOFAS hindfoot score. Standardized a-p and lateral radiographs were taken and RSA analyses were done at regular intervals. Results There was no difference in results between ankles operated on due to rheumatoid arthritis and due to osteoarthrosis. A rapid initial migration was observed for the tibial components at 6 weeks, but thereafter all but 1 implant seemed stable. The migration pattern for the talar component was similar. Rotation around the 3 axes was observed for the tibial components at 6 weeks, but not thereafter. The talar components became stable for rotation around the longitudinal and sagittal axes, but not around the transverse axis. 8 out of 10 ankles were painless. The median total AOFAS score was 83 and the median range of motion was 32 degrees. None of the 20 components had changed position and there were no signs of bone resorption. Interpretation Provided the indication is adequate and the prosthesis has been implanted correctly, the double-coated STAR ankle prosthesis will have a satisfactory fixation to underlying bone.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 579
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Uncemented STAR total ankle prostheses -: Three to eight-year follow-up of fifty-one consecutive ankles [J].
Anderson, T ;
Montgomery, F ;
Carlsson, Å .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A (07) :1321-1329
[2]  
ANDERSON T, 2004, J BONE JOINT SURG S1, P103
[3]   Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation -: A randomized radiostereometric study comparing porous-coated, hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components over 5 years [J].
Carlsson, Å ;
Björkman, A ;
Besjakov, J ;
Önsten, I .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2005, 76 (03) :362-369
[4]   ROENTGEN STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRY - REVIEW OF ORTHOPEDIC APPLICATIONS [J].
KARRHOLM, J .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1989, 60 (04) :491-503
[5]   CLINICAL RATING SYSTEMS FOR THE ANKLE-HINDFOOT, MIDFOOT, HALLUX, AND LESSER TOES [J].
KITAOKA, HB ;
ALEXANDER, IJ ;
ADELAAR, RS ;
NUNLEY, JA ;
MYERSON, MS ;
SANDERS, M .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 15 (07) :349-353
[6]  
KOFOED H, 1986, MAT SCI IMPLANT ORTH, P75
[7]   RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS AND RELATED CONDITIONS BY STANDARD REFERENCE FILMS [J].
LARSEN, A ;
DALE, K ;
EEK, M .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA-DIAGNOSIS, 1977, 18 (04) :481-491
[8]  
Makwana NK, 1995, Foot, V5, P180, DOI DOI 10.1016/0958-2592(95)90046-2
[9]   Hydroxyapatite coating versus cemented fixation of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty -: Prospective randomized comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components with 5-year follow-up using radiostereometry [J].
Nilsson, KG ;
Kärrholm, J ;
Carlsson, L ;
Dalén, T .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1999, 14 (01) :9-20
[10]  
SELVIK G, 1989, THESIS