Management strategy evaluation: a powerful tool for conservation?

被引:194
作者
Bunnefeld, Nils [1 ]
Hoshino, Eriko [1 ,2 ]
Milner-Gulland, Eleanor J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Life Sci, Ascot SL5 7PY, Berks, England
[2] Univ Tasmania, Sch Econ & Finance, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
关键词
GREAT-BARRIER-REEF; ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; UNCERTAINTY; FISHERY; HARVEST; WILDLIFE; MODELS; COMMUNITIES; ECONOMICS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.tree.2011.05.003
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The poor management of natural resources has led in many cases to the decline and extirpation of populations. Recent advances in fisheries science could revolutionize management of harvested stocks by evaluating management scenarios in a virtual world by including stakeholders and by assessing its robustness to uncertainty. These advances have been synthesized into a framework, management strategy evaluation (WISE), which has hitherto not been used in terrestrial conservation. We review the potential of MSE to transform terrestrial conservation, emphasizing that the behavior of individual harvesters must be included because harvester compliance with management rules has been a major challenge in conservation. Incorporating resource user decision-making required to make MSEs relevant to terrestrial conservation will also advance fisheries science.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 447
页数:7
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Wildlife harvest in integrated conservation and development projects: Linking harvest to household demand, agricultural production, and environmental shocks in the Serengeti [J].
Barrett, CB ;
Arcese, P .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1998, 74 (04) :449-465
[2]   Why a management procedure approach? Some positives and negatives [J].
Butterworth, Doug S. .
ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2007, 64 (04) :613-617
[3]   Purported flaws in management strategy evaluation: basic problems or misinterpretations? [J].
Butterworth, Douglas S. ;
Bentley, Nokome ;
De Oliveira, Jose A. A. ;
Donovan, Gregory P. ;
Kell, Laurence T. ;
Parma, Ana M. ;
Punt, Andre E. ;
Sainsbury, Keith J. ;
Smith, Anthony D. M. ;
Stokes, T. Kevin .
ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2010, 67 (03) :567-574
[4]  
Campbell KLI., 1995, SERENGETI, P534
[5]   Linking modelling, monitoring and management: an integrated approach to controlling overabundant wildlife [J].
Chee, Yung En ;
Wintle, Brendan A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2010, 47 (06) :1169-1178
[6]   Management procedures in a fishery based on highly variable stocks and with conflicting objectives: Experiences in the South African pelagic fishery [J].
Cochrane, KL ;
Butterworth, DS ;
de Oliveira, JAA ;
Roel, BA .
REVIEWS IN FISH BIOLOGY AND FISHERIES, 1998, 8 (02) :177-214
[7]   Improvement of fishery-management advice through simulation testing of harvest algorithms [J].
Cooke, JG .
ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 1999, 56 (06) :797-810
[8]   A bioeconomic analysis of bushmeat hunting [J].
Damania, R ;
Milner-Gulland, EJ ;
Crookes, DJ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 272 (1560) :259-266
[9]   On implementing maximum economic yield in commercial fisheries [J].
Dichmont, C. M. ;
Pascoe, S. ;
Kompas, T. ;
Punt, A. E. ;
Deng, R. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (01) :16-21
[10]   Beyond biological performance measures in management strategy evaluation: Bringing in economics and the effects of trawling on the benthos [J].
Dichmont, C. M. ;
Deng, A. ;
Punt, A. E. ;
Ellis, N. ;
Venables, W. N. ;
Kompas, T. ;
Ye, Y. ;
Zhou, S. ;
Bishop, J. .
FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2008, 94 (03) :238-250