Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability

被引:415
作者
Orlitzky, Marc [1 ]
Siegel, Donald S. [2 ]
Waldman, David A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Div Business & Engn, Altoona, PA 16601 USA
[2] SUNY Albany, Sch Business, Albany, NY 12222 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, WP Carey Sch Business, Tempe, AZ USA
关键词
corporate social performance; corporate social responsibility; environmental sustainability; resource-based view of the firm; strategic leadership; GREEN MANAGEMENT MATTERS; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; STAKEHOLDER THEORY; ORGANIZATIONAL SCIENCE; PARADIGM DEVELOPMENT; PRIVATE PROVISION; FIRM PERSPECTIVE; LEADERSHIP; ECONOMICS; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1177/0007650310394323
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The authors review three theoretical approaches to strategic corporate social responsibility (CSR), which can be defined as voluntary CSR actions that enhance a firm's competitiveness and reputation. The end result of such activities should be an improvement in financial and economic performance. Based on an overview of recent empirical evidence, the authors conclude that economic theories of strategic CSR have the greatest potential for advancing this field of inquiry, although theories of strategic leadership should also be incorporated into this perspective. In the remainder of the article, they provide focused summaries of the articles presented in this special issue and outline an agenda for future research on strategic CSR and environmental sustainability.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 27
页数:22
相关论文
共 112 条
[41]  
Griffin J.J., 1997, Business and Society, V36, P5, DOI [DOI 10.1177/000765039703600102, 10.1177/000765039703600102]
[42]  
Hart S., 1995, ACAD MANAGE REV, V20, P966
[43]   Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis [J].
Harter, JK ;
Schmidt, FL ;
Hayes, TL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 87 (02) :268-279
[44]   VOTE-COUNTING METHODS IN RESEARCH SYNTHESIS [J].
HEDGES, LV ;
OLKIN, I .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1980, 88 (02) :359-369
[45]   HOW HARD IS HARD SCIENCE, HOW SOFT IS SOFT SCIENCE - THE EMPIRICAL CUMULATIVENESS OF RESEARCH [J].
HEDGES, LV .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1987, 42 (05) :443-455
[47]  
Hunt M.M., 1997, SCI TAKES STOCK STOR
[48]  
Hunter J.E., 1990, METHODS METAANALYSIS
[49]   Taking Friedman seriously: Maximizing profits and social performance [J].
Husted, BW ;
Salazar, JDJ .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2006, 43 (01) :75-91
[50]   Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function [J].
Jensen, MC .
BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY, 2002, 12 (02) :235-256