Glycaemic control is associated with pre-eclampsia but not with pregnancy-induced hypertension in women with Type I diabetes mellitus

被引:83
作者
Hiilesmaa, V [1 ]
Suhonen, L [1 ]
Teramo, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, FIN-00290 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
adult; insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; female; glycated hemoglobin A; hyperglycaemia; hypertension; pre-eclampsia; pregnancy; diabetes during pregnancy;
D O I
10.1007/s001250051565
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims/hypothesis. To investigate the association between glycaemic control and hypertensive pregnancy complications. Methods. From 1988 to 1997, we followed up 683 consecutive non-selected pregnancies in women with Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Glycaemic control was assessed by assay of HbA(1c). Pre-eclampsia was defined as diastolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg or more at the end of pregnancy after an increase of 15 mmHg or more, combined with proteinuria of 0.3 g or more for 24 h. Pregnancy-induced hypertension was defined similarly but without proteinuria. The same criteria were applied to a control group of 854 non-selected non-diabetic women. Results. Pre-eclampsia developed in 12.8% of the women with diabetes (excluding those with nephropathy before pregnancy) and in 2.7% of the control women (odds ratio 5.2; 95% CI 3.3-8.4). In multiple logistic regression, glycaemic control, nulliparity, retinopathy and duration of diabetes emerged as statistically significant independent predictors of pre-eclampsia. The adjusted odds ratios for pre-eclampsia were 1.6 (95% CI 1.3-2.0) for each 1% increment in the HbA(1c) value at 4-14 (median 7) weeks of gestation and 0.6 (0.5-0.8) for each 1% decrement achieved during the first half of pregnancy. Changes in glycaemic control during the second half of pregnancy did not significantly alter the risk of pre-eclampsia. Unlike pre-eclampsia, the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension was not associated with glycaemic control. Conclusion/interpretation. In women with Type I diabetes, poor glycaemic control is associated with an increased risk of pre-eclampsia but not with a risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension.
引用
收藏
页码:1534 / 1539
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[11]   DIABETES AND PREGNANCY [J].
KYLE, GC .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1963, 59 :1-+
[12]   AN ANALYSIS OF DIABETIC PREGNANCIES AT MAYO-CLINIC, 1950-79 [J].
LUFKIN, EG ;
NELSON, RL ;
HILL, LM ;
MELTON, LJ ;
OFALLON, WM ;
EVANS, AT .
DIABETES CARE, 1984, 7 (06) :539-547
[13]   Evaluation of a definition of pre-eclampsia [J].
North, RA ;
Taylor, RS ;
Schellenberg, JC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 106 (08) :767-773
[14]   PROGNOSIS OF OUTCOME OF PREGNANCIES IN DIABETICS - A NEW CLASSIFICATION [J].
PEDERSEN, J ;
PEDERSEN, LM .
ACTA ENDOCRINOLOGICA, 1965, 50 (01) :70-&
[15]  
REDMAN CWG, 1988, LANCET, V1, P809
[16]   POOR GLYCEMIC CONTROL AND ANTEPARTUM OBSTETRIC COMPLICATIONS IN WOMEN WITH INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES [J].
ROSENN, B ;
MIODOVNIK, M ;
COMBS, CA ;
KHOURY, J ;
SIDDIQI, TA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1993, 43 (01) :21-28
[17]   What is the significance of macrosomia? [J].
Schwartz, R ;
Teramo, KA .
DIABETES CARE, 1999, 22 (07) :1201-1205
[18]  
SIDDIQI T, 1991, OBSTET GYNECOL, V77, P514
[19]   The definition of pre-eclampsia [J].
Steer, PJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 106 (08) :753-755
[20]   PREGNANCY COMPLICATING DIABETES [J].
WHITE, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1949, 7 (05) :609-616