Phase II clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA: Dose, safety aspects, and pulse sequence

被引:259
作者
Reimer, P
Rummeny, EJ
Shamsi, K
Balzer, T
Daldrup, HE
Tombach, B
Hesse, T
Berns, T
Peters, PE
机构
[1] UNIV MUNSTER, DEPT SURG, D-48129 MUNSTER, GERMANY
[2] SCHERING AG, W-1000 BERLIN, GERMANY
关键词
contrast media; experimental studies; gadolinium; liver; MR; magnetic resonance (MR); contrast enhancement;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.199.1.8633143
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) in the detection of focal liver lesions with respect to dose, side effects, and pulse sequence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized double-blinded trial was performed in 33 patients with focal solid liver lesions. A bolus of Gd-EOB-DTPA, a liver-specific contrast agent, was intravenously administered at three different doses (12.5, 25, and 50 mu mol per kilogram of body weight). Magnetic resonance imaging with different T1-weighted techniques was performed 20 and 45 minutes after administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA. Changes in liver signal intensity, lesion-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (C/N), detectable liver lesions, side effects, and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: Gd-EOB-DTPA significantly (P <.05) increased liver signal intensity and lesion-liver C/N within the dose range tested. Lesion detection was improved 20 and 45 minutes after administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA. A dose of 12.5 mu mol was sufficient for the detection of focal liver lesions, and the breath-hold, T1-weighted, fast low-angle shot pulse sequence was the most useful. No significant changes in vital signs, clinical laboratory test results, and urinalysis were observed. CONCLUSION: Gd-EOB-DTPA is an efficient, diagnostically useful, and safe contrast agent.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 183
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Armitage P, 1987, Statistical methods in medical research, V2nd
  • [2] HEPATIC MR IMAGING WITH MN-DPDP - SAFETY, IMAGE QUALITY, AND SENSITIVITY
    BERNARDINO, ME
    YOUNG, SW
    LEE, JKT
    WEINREB, JC
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1992, 183 (01) : 53 - 58
  • [3] BRASCH RC, 1992, RADIOLOGY, V183, P1
  • [4] EVALUATION OF RADIATION-INDUCED LIVER-INJURY WITH MR-IMAGING - COMPARISON OF HEPATOCELLULAR AND RETICULOENDOTHELIAL CONTRAST AGENTS
    CLEMENT, O
    MUHLER, A
    VEXLER, VS
    ROSENAU, W
    BERTHEZENE, Y
    KUWATSURU, R
    BRASCH, RC
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 (01) : 163 - 168
  • [5] COMPARISON OF GD-EOB-DTPA AND GD-DTPA FOR CONTRAST-ENHANCED MR-IMAGING OF LIVER-TUMORS
    CLEMENT, O
    MUHLER, A
    VEXLER, VS
    KUWATSURU, R
    BERTHEZENE, Y
    ROSENAU, W
    BRASCH, RC
    [J]. JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1993, 3 (01): : 71 - 77
  • [6] CLEMENT O, 1992, INVEST RADIOL, V27, P612
  • [7] GRANT D, 1993, 10TH EUR SOC MAGN RE, P251
  • [8] FOCAL LIVER-LESIONS - MR IMAGING WITH MN-DPDP - INITIAL CLINICAL-RESULTS IN 40 PATIENTS
    HAMM, B
    VOGL, TJ
    BRANDING, G
    SCHNELL, B
    TAUPITZ, M
    WOLF, KJ
    LISSNER, J
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1992, 182 (01) : 167 - 174
  • [9] PHASE-I CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF GD-EOB-DTPA AS A HEPATOBILIARY MR CONTRAST AGENT - SAFETY, PHARMACOKINETICS, AND MR-IMAGING
    HAMM, B
    STAKS, T
    MUHLER, A
    BOLLOW, M
    TAUPITZ, M
    FRENZEL, T
    WOLF, KJ
    WEINMANN, HJ
    LANGE, L
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1995, 195 (03) : 785 - 792
  • [10] HEPATOBILIARY MR CONTRAST AGENTS - 5-SUBSTITUTED IRON-EHPG DERIVATIVES
    LAUFFER, RB
    VINCENT, AC
    PADMANABHAN, S
    VILLRINGER, A
    SAINI, S
    ELMALEH, DR
    BRADY, TJ
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1987, 4 (06) : 582 - 590