The economic value of childhood varicella vaccination in France and Germany

被引:42
作者
Coudeville, L
Brunot, A
Szucs, TD
Dervaux, B
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Lille, CRESGE, LABORES, F-59016 Lille, France
[2] Univ Zurich, Inst Social & Prevent Med, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
children vaccination; economic evaluation; model; varicella;
D O I
10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04005.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the economic impact of childhood varicella vaccination in France and Germany. Methods: A common methodology based on the use of a varicella transmission model was used for the two countries. Cost data (2002(sic)) were derived from two previous studies. The analysis focused on a routine vaccination program for which three different coverage rates (CRs) were considered (90%, 70%, and 45%). Catch-up strategies were also analyzed. A societal perspective including both direct and indirect costs and a third-party payer perspective were considered (Social Security in France and Sickness Funds in Germany). Results: A routine vaccination program has a clear positive impact on varicella-related morbidity in both countries. With a 90% CR, the number of varicella-related deaths was reduced by 87% in Germany and by 84% in France. In addition, with a CR of 90%, routine varicella vaccination induces savings in both countries from both societal (Germany 61%, France 60%) and third-party payer perspectives (Germany 51%, France 6.7%). For lower CRs, routine vaccination remains cost saving from a third-party payer perspective in Germany but not in France, where it is nevertheless cost-effective (cost per life-year gained of 6521(sic) in the base case with a 45% CR). Conclusions: Considering the impact of vaccination on varicella morbidity and costs, a routine varicella vaccination program appears to be cost saving in Germany and France from both a societal and a third-party payer perspective. For France, routine varicella vaccination remains cost-effective in worst cases when a third-party payer perspective is adopted. Catch-up programs provide additional savings.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 222
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
ANDERSON R M, 1991
[2]   The cost-effectiveness of routine childhood varicella vaccination in Germany [J].
Banz, K ;
Wagenpfeil, S ;
Neiss, A ;
Goertz, A ;
Staginnus, U ;
Vollmar, J ;
Wutzler, P .
VACCINE, 2003, 21 (11-12) :1256-1267
[3]  
Barker L, 2002, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V51, P664
[4]   Costs and benefits of routine varicella vaccination in German children [J].
Beutels, P ;
Clara, R ;
Tormans, G ;
VanDoorslaer, E ;
VanDamme, P .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1996, 174 :S335-S341
[5]   Postmarketing evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of varicella vaccine [J].
Black, S ;
Shinefield, H ;
Ray, P ;
Lewis, E ;
Hansen, J ;
Schwalbe, J ;
Coplan, P ;
Sharrar, R ;
Guess, H .
PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 1999, 18 (12) :1041-1046
[6]  
Brisson M., 2003, Journal of Medical Virology, V70, pS9, DOI 10.1002/jmv.10313
[7]   Varicella vaccination in England and Wales: cost-utility analysis [J].
Brisson, M ;
Edmunds, WJ .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2003, 88 (10) :862-869
[8]   The cost-effectiveness of varicella vaccination in Canada [J].
Brisson, M ;
Edmunds, WJ .
VACCINE, 2002, 20 (7-8) :1113-1125
[9]   Modelling the impact of immunization on the epidemiology of varicella zoster virus [J].
Brisson, M ;
Edmunds, WJ ;
Gay, NJ ;
Law, B ;
De Serres, G .
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2000, 125 (03) :651-669
[10]   On the economic foundations of CEA. Ladies and gentlemen, take your positions! [J].
Brouwer, WBF ;
Koopmanschap, MA .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2000, 19 (04) :439-459