The economic value of childhood varicella vaccination in France and Germany

被引:42
作者
Coudeville, L
Brunot, A
Szucs, TD
Dervaux, B
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Lille, CRESGE, LABORES, F-59016 Lille, France
[2] Univ Zurich, Inst Social & Prevent Med, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
children vaccination; economic evaluation; model; varicella;
D O I
10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04005.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the economic impact of childhood varicella vaccination in France and Germany. Methods: A common methodology based on the use of a varicella transmission model was used for the two countries. Cost data (2002(sic)) were derived from two previous studies. The analysis focused on a routine vaccination program for which three different coverage rates (CRs) were considered (90%, 70%, and 45%). Catch-up strategies were also analyzed. A societal perspective including both direct and indirect costs and a third-party payer perspective were considered (Social Security in France and Sickness Funds in Germany). Results: A routine vaccination program has a clear positive impact on varicella-related morbidity in both countries. With a 90% CR, the number of varicella-related deaths was reduced by 87% in Germany and by 84% in France. In addition, with a CR of 90%, routine varicella vaccination induces savings in both countries from both societal (Germany 61%, France 60%) and third-party payer perspectives (Germany 51%, France 6.7%). For lower CRs, routine vaccination remains cost saving from a third-party payer perspective in Germany but not in France, where it is nevertheless cost-effective (cost per life-year gained of 6521(sic) in the base case with a 45% CR). Conclusions: Considering the impact of vaccination on varicella morbidity and costs, a routine varicella vaccination program appears to be cost saving in Germany and France from both a societal and a third-party payer perspective. For France, routine varicella vaccination remains cost-effective in worst cases when a third-party payer perspective is adopted. Catch-up programs provide additional savings.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 222
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
[41]   LIVE VACCINE USED TO PREVENT SPREAD OF VARICELLA IN CHILDREN IN HOSPITAL [J].
TAKAHASH.M ;
OTSUKA, T ;
OKUNO, Y ;
ASANO, Y ;
YAZAKI, T ;
ISOMURA, S .
LANCET, 1974, 2 (7892) :1288-1290
[42]   Economic evaluations of varicella vaccination programmes - A review of the literature [J].
Thiry, N ;
Beutels, P ;
Van Damme, P ;
Van Doorslaer, E .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2003, 21 (01) :13-38
[43]   Childhood vaccination against varicella: Persistence of antibody, duration of protection, and vaccine efficacy [J].
Vessey, SJR ;
Chan, CY ;
Kuter, BJ ;
Kaplan, KM ;
Waters, M ;
Kutzler, DP ;
Carfagno, PA ;
Sadoff, JC ;
Heyse, JF ;
Matthews, H ;
Li, S ;
Chan, ISF .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2001, 139 (02) :297-304
[44]   Modified varicella-like syndrome in children previously vaccinated with live attenuated measles, mumps, rubella and varicella vaccine [J].
Walter, EB ;
Simmons, SS ;
Bland, CL ;
Clements, DA .
PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 1997, 16 (06) :626-627
[45]   Seroprevalence of varicella-zoster virus in the German population [J].
Wutzler, P ;
Färber, I ;
Wagenpfeil, S ;
Bisanz, H ;
Tischer, A .
VACCINE, 2001, 20 (1-2) :121-124