Review of early clinical results and complications associated with oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF)

被引:94
作者
Phan, Kevin
Maharaj, Monish
Assem, Yusuf
Mobbs, Ralph J. [1 ]
机构
[1] NeuroSpine Surg Res Grp NSURG, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Anterior-to-psoas; ATP; Interbody; LATERO; Oblique lumbar interbody fusion; OLIF; MINI-OPEN; DECOMPRESSION; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocn.2016.02.030
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Lumbar interbody fusion represents an effective surgical intervention for patients with lumbar degenerative diseases, spondylolisthesis, disc herniation, pseudoarthrosis and spinal deformities. Traditionally, conventional open anterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques have been employed with excellent results, but each with their own advantages and caveats. Most recently, the antero-oblique trajectory has been introduced, providing yet another corridor to access the lumbar spine. Termed the oblique lumbar interbody fusion, this approach accesses the spine between the anterior vessels and psoas muscles, avoiding both sets of structures to allow efficient clearance of the disc space and application of a large interbody device to afford distraction for foraminal decompression and endplate preparation for rapid and thorough fusion. This review aims to summarize the early clinical results and complications of this new technique and discusses potential future directions of research. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 29
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]
Stand-alone minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion: Multicenter clinical outcomes [J].
Ahmadian, Arnir ;
Bach, Konrad ;
Bolinger, Bryan ;
Malham, Gregory M. ;
Okonkwo, David O. ;
Kanter, Adam S. ;
Uribe, Juan S. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 22 (04) :740-746
[2]
[Anonymous], WORLD C MIN INV SPIN
[3]
Arnold Paul M, 2012, Surg Neurol Int, V3, pS198, DOI 10.4103/2152-7806.98583
[4]
Minimal access spinal technologies: state-of-the-art, indications, and techniques [J].
Assaker, R .
JOINT BONE SPINE, 2004, 71 (06) :459-469
[5]
Endoscopic lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine [J].
Bergey, DL ;
Villavicencio, AT ;
Goldstein, T ;
Regan, JJ .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (15) :1681-1688
[6]
Briggs H, 1944, J BONE JOINT SURG, V26, P125
[7]
Spondylolisthesis. [J].
Capener, N .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1932, 19 (75) :374-386
[8]
Biomechanical comparison of three stand-alone lumbar cages - a three-dimensional finite element analysis [J].
Chen, Shih-Hao ;
Chiang, Ming-Chieh ;
Lin, Jin-Fu ;
Lin, Shang-Chih ;
Hung, Ching-Hua .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2013, 14
[9]
Comparison of low back fusion techniques: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches [J].
Cole C.D. ;
McCall T.D. ;
Schmidt M.H. ;
Dailey A.T. .
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2009, 2 (2) :118-126
[10]
An analysis of postoperative thigh symptoms after minimally invasive transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion [J].
Cummock, Matthew D. ;
Vanni, Steven ;
Levi, Allan D. ;
Yu, Yong ;
Wang, Michael Y. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2011, 15 (01) :11-18