SIP-based mobility architecture for next generation wireless networks

被引：28

作者：

Banerjee, N ^{[1
]}

Das, SK ^{[1
]}

Acharya, A ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Texas, CReWMaN, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Arlington, TX 76019 USA

来源：

THIRD IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PERVASIVE COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS | 2005年

关键词：

D O I：

10.1109/PERCOM.2005.40

中图分类号：

TP301 [理论、方法];

学科分类号：

081202 ;

摘要：

Application-level protocol abstraction is required to support seamless mobility in next generation heterogeneous wireless networks. Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) provides such an abstraction in providing mobility support in such networks. However, the handoff procedure with SIP suffers from undesirable delay and hence packet loss for some cases, which is detrimental to applications such as Voice over IP (VoIP) or streaming video with stringent quality of service (QoS) requirements. In this paper we propose a SIP based architecture that supports soft handoff for IP centric wireless networks alleviating the problem of packet loss. The proposed architecture ensures that there is no packet loss and the end-to-end delay jitter is kept under control, thus maintaining two important parameters dictating the QoS for streaming multimedia applications.

引用

页码：181 / 190

页数：10

共 30 条

[11]

JIANG W, 2001, NOSSDAV, P177

[12] Transport level mechanisms for bandwidth aggregation on mobile hosts [J].

Magalhaes, L ;

Kravets, R .

NETWORK PROTOCOLS, 2001, :165-171

[13]

MAHY R, 2001, DRAFTIETFSIPJOINT03T

[14]

Mysore J., 1997, MobiCom '97. Proceedings of the Third Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, P161, DOI 10.1145/262116.262144

[15]

PERKINS C, 2001, DRAFTIETFMOBILEIPOPT

[16]

PERKINS CE, 2002, 3220 RFC

[17]

Raivio Y, 2001, IEE CONF PUBL, P346, DOI 10.1049/cp:20010069

[18] IP-based access network infrastructure for next-generation wireless data networks [J].

Ramjee, R ;

La Porta, TF ;

Salgarelli, L ;

Thuel, S ;

Varadhan, K ;

Li, L .

IEEE PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2000, 7 (04) :34-41

[19]

RAYCHAUDHURI D, 2002, INT 4G FOR LOND 15 M

[20]

ROSENBERG J, 2002, 3261 IETF RFC

← 1 2 3 →