Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit

被引:286
作者
Ludlow, JB
Davies-Ludlow, LE
Brooks, SL
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Dent, Dept Diagnost Sci & Gen Dent, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Oral Med Pathol Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
thermoluminescent dosimetry; tomography; X-ray computed; radiography; panoramic;
D O I
10.1259/dmfr/26310390
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study provides effective dose measurements for two extraoral direct digital imaging devices, the NewTom 9000(TM) cone beam CT (CBCT) unit and the Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Methods: Thermo luminescent dosemeters were placed at 20 sites throughout the layers of the head and neck of a tissue-equivalent RANDO phantom. Variations in phantom orientation and beam collimation were used to create three different CBCT examination techniques: a combined maxillary and mandibular scan (Max/Man), a maxillary scan and a mandibular scan. Ten exposures for each technique were used to ensure a reliable measure of radiation from the dosemeters. Average tissue-absorbed dose, weighted equivalent dose and effective dose were calculated for each major anatomical site. Effective doses of individual organs were summed with salivary gland exposures (E-SAL) and without salivary gland exposures (E-ICRP60) to calculate two measures of whole-body effective dose. Results: The effective doses for CBCT were: Max/Man scan, E-ICRP60 = 36.3 muSv, E-SAL = 77.9 muSv; maxillary scan, E-ICRP60 = 19.9 muSv, E-SAL = 41.5 muSv; and mandibular scan, E-ICRP60 = 34.7 muSv, E-SAL = 74.7 muSv. Effective doses for the panoramic examination were E-ICRP60 = 6.2 muSv and E-SAL = 22.0 muSv. Conclusion: When viewed in the context of potential diagnostic yield, the E-ICRP60 of 36.3 muSv for the NewTom compares favourably with published effective doses for conventional CT (314 muSv) and film tomography (2 - 9 muSv per image). CBCT examinations resulted in doses that were 3 - 7 (E-ICRP60) and 2-4 (E-SAL) times the panoramic doses observed in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 234
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ANN ICRP
[2]   Effective dose from radiation absorbed during a panoramic examination with a new generation machine [J].
Danforth, RA ;
Clark, DE .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2000, 89 (02) :236-243
[3]  
DANFORTH RA, 2002, AM AC OR MAX RAD 53
[4]   Comparative dose measurements by spiral tomography for preimplant diagnosis: The Scanora machine versus the Cranex Tome radiography unit [J].
Dula, K ;
Mini, R ;
van der Stelt, PF ;
Sanderink, GCH ;
Schneeberger, P ;
Buser, D .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2001, 91 (06) :735-742
[5]   EFFECTIVE DOSE AND RISK ASSESSMENT FROM FILM TOMOGRAPHY USED FOR DENTAL IMPLANT DIAGNOSTICS [J].
FREDERIKSEN, NL ;
BENSON, BW ;
SOKOLOWSKI, TW .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1994, 23 (03) :123-127
[6]   EFFECTIVE DOSE AND RISK ASSESSMENT FROM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY OF THE MAXILLOFACIAL COMPLEX [J].
FREDERIKSEN, NL ;
BENSON, BW ;
SOKOLOWSKI, TW .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1995, 24 (01) :55-58
[7]   GEOMETRIC METHOD FOR MEASURING BODY-SURFACE AREA - HEIGHT-WEIGHT FORMULA VALIDATED IN INFANTS, CHILDREN, AND ADULTS [J].
HAYCOCK, GB ;
SCHWARTZ, GJ ;
WISOTSKY, DH .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1978, 93 (01) :62-66
[8]  
ICRP, 1991, ANN ICRP, V21
[9]   Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography [J].
Lecomber, AR ;
Yoneyama, Y ;
Lovelock, DJ ;
Hosoi, T ;
Adams, AM .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2001, 30 (05) :255-259
[10]   A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results [J].
Mozzo, P ;
Procacci, C ;
Tacconi, A ;
Martini, PT ;
Andreis, IAB .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1998, 8 (09) :1558-1564