Comparison of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus the combination of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation and an inspiratory impedance threshold device for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

被引:125
作者
Wolcke, BB
Mauer, DK
Schoefmann, MF
Teichmann, H
Provo, TA
Lindner, KH
Dick, WF
Aeppli, D
Lurie, KG
机构
[1] Univ Mainz, Sch Med, Anesthesiol Clin, D-6500 Mainz, Germany
[2] Leopold Franzens Inst, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care Med, Innsbruck, Austria
[3] Adv Circulatory Syst Inc, Eden Prairie, MN USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Div Biostat, Minneapolis, MN USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Minneapolis, MN USA
[6] Univ Minnesota, Dept Emergency Med, Minneapolis, MN USA
[7] Hennepin Cty Med Ctr, Minneapolis, MN 55415 USA
关键词
cardiac arrest; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; treatment;
D O I
10.1161/01.CIR.0000095787.99180.B5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-Active compression-decompression (ACD) CPR combined with an inspiratory impedance threshold device (ITD) improves vital organ blood flow during cardiac arrest. This study compared survival rates with ACD+ITD CPR versus standard manual CPR (S-CPR). Methods and Results-A prospective, controlled trial was performed in Mainz, Germany, in which a 2-tiered emergency response included early defibrillation. Patients with out-of-hospital arrest of presumed cardiac pathogenesis were sequentially randomized to ACD+ITD CPR or S-CPR by the advanced life support team after intubation. Rescuers learned which method of CPR to use at the start of each work shift. The primary end point was 1-hour survival after a witnessed arrest. With ACD+ITD CPR (n=103), return of spontaneous circulation and 1- and 24-hour survival rates were 55%, 51%, and 37% versus 37%, 32%, and 22% with S-CPR (n=107) (P=0.016, 0.006, and 0.033, respectively). One- and 24-hour survival rates in witnessed arrests were 55% and 41% with ACD+ITD CPR versus 33% and 23% in control subjects (P=0.011 and 0.019), respectively. One- and 24-hour survival rates in patients with a witnessed arrest in ventricular fibrillation were 68% and 58% after ACD+ITD CPR versus 27% and 23% after S-CPR (P=0.002 and 0.009), respectively. Patients randomized greater than or equal to10 minutes after the call for help to the ACD+ITD CPR had a 3 times higher 1- hour survival rate than control subjects (P=0.002). Hospital discharge rates were 18% after ACD+ITD CPR versus 13% in control subjects (P=0.41). In witnessed arrests, overall neurological function trended higher with ACD+ITD CPR versus control subjects (P=0.07). Conclusions-Compared with S-CPR, ACD+ITD CPR significantly improved short-term survival rates for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Additional studies are needed to evaluate potential long-term benefits of ACD+ITD CPR.
引用
收藏
页码:2201 / 2205
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia [J].
Bernard, SA ;
Gray, TW ;
Buist, MD ;
Jones, BM ;
Silvester, W ;
Gutteridge, G ;
Smith, K .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (08) :557-563
[2]   Influence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation prior to defibrillation in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation [J].
Cobb, LA ;
Fahrenbruch, CE ;
Walsh, TR ;
Copass, MK ;
Olsufka, M ;
Breskin, M ;
Hallstrom, AP .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (13) :1182-1188
[3]   A comparison of repeated high doses and repeated standard doses of epinephrine for cardiac arrest outside the hospital [J].
Gueugniaud, PY ;
Mols, P ;
Goldstein, P ;
Pham, E ;
Dubien, PY ;
Deweerdt, C ;
Vergnion, M ;
Petit, P ;
Carli, P .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (22) :1595-1601
[4]  
Holzer M, 2002, NEW ENGL J MED, V346, P549
[5]   Utstein-style guidelines for uniform reporting of laboratory CPR research. [J].
Idris, AH ;
Becker, LB ;
Ornato, JP ;
Hedges, JR ;
Bircher, NG ;
Chandra, NC ;
Cummins, RO ;
Dick, W ;
Ebmeyer, U ;
Halperin, HR ;
Hazinski, MF ;
Kerber, RE ;
Kern, KB ;
Safar, P ;
Steen, PA ;
Swindle, MM ;
Tsitlik, JE ;
vonPlanta, I ;
vonPlanta, M ;
Wears, RL ;
Weil, MH .
RESUSCITATION, 1996, 33 (01) :69-84
[6]   Use of an inspiratory impedance threshold valve during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a progress report [J].
Lurie, K ;
Voelckel, W ;
Plaisance, P ;
Zielinski, T ;
McKnite, S ;
Kor, D ;
Sugiyama, A ;
Sukhum, P .
RESUSCITATION, 2000, 44 (03) :219-230
[7]   Use of an inspiratory impedance valve improves neurologically intact survival in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation [J].
Lurie, KG ;
Zielinski, T ;
McKnite, S ;
Aufderheide, T ;
Voelckel, W .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 105 (01) :124-129
[8]   Improving standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation with an inspiratory impedance threshold valve in a porcine model of cardiac arrest [J].
Lurie, KG ;
Voelckel, WG ;
Zielinski, T ;
McKnite, S ;
Lindstrom, P ;
Peterson, C ;
Wenzel, V ;
Lindner, KH ;
Samniah, N ;
Benditt, D .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 93 (03) :649-655
[9]   Optimizing standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation with an inspiratory impedance threshold valve [J].
Lurie, KG ;
Mulligan, KA ;
McKnite, S ;
Detloff, B ;
Lindstrom, P ;
Lindner, KH .
CHEST, 1998, 113 (04) :1084-1090
[10]   IMPROVING ACTIVE COMPRESSION-DECOMPRESSION CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION WITH AN INSPIRATORY IMPEDANCE VALVE [J].
LURIE, KG ;
COFFEEN, P ;
SHULTZ, J ;
MCKNITE, S ;
DETLOFF, B ;
MULLIGAN, K .
CIRCULATION, 1995, 91 (06) :1629-1632