Comparison of structured use of routine laboratory tests or near-patient assessment with clinical judgement in the management of bleeding after cardiac surgery

被引:187
作者
Avidan, MS
Alcock, EL
Da Fonseca, J
Ponte, J
Desai, JB
Despotis, GJ
Hunt, BJ
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Blood Bank, St Louis, MO USA
[3] Kings Coll Hosp London, Dept Anaesthesia, London, England
[4] Kings Coll Hosp London, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, London, England
[5] Guys Kings & St Thomas Med Sch, Dept Haematol, London, England
关键词
assessment; near-patient tests; complications; bleeding diathesis; protocol; clinical;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aeh037
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. Using algorithms based on point of care coagulation tests can decrease blood loss and blood component transfusion after cardiac surgery. We wished to test the hypothesis that a management algorithm based on near-patient tests would reduce blood loss and blood component use after routine coronary artery surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass when compared with an algorithm based on routine laboratory assays or with clinical judgement. Methods. Patients (n=102) undergoing elective coronary artery surgery with cardiac bypass were randomized into two groups. In the point of care group, the management algorithm was based on information provided by three devices, the Hepcon(R) thromboelastography and the PFA-100(R) platelet function analyser. Management in the laboratory test group depended on rapidly available laboratory clotting tests and transfusion of haemostatic blood components only if specific criteria were met. Blood loss and transfusion was compared between these two groups and with a retrospective case-control group (n=108), in which management of bleeding had been according to the clinician's discretion. Results. All three groups had similar median blood losses. The transfusion of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) and blood components was greater in the clinician discretion group (P<0.05) but there was no difference in the transfusion of PRBCs and blood components between the two algorithm-guided groups. Conclusion. Following algorithms based on point of care tests or on structured clinical practice with standard laboratory tests does not decrease blood loss, but reduces the transfusion of PRBCs and blood components after routine cardiac surgery, when compared with clinician discretion. Cardiac surgery services should use transfusion guidelines based on laboratory-guided algorithms, and the possible benefits of point of care testing should be tested against this standard.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 186
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [11] Anticoagulation monitoring during cardiac surgery - A review of current and emerging techniques
    Despotis, GJ
    Gravlee, G
    Filos, K
    Levy, J
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 91 (04) : 1122 - 1151
  • [12] ON-SITE PROTHROMBIN TIME, ACTIVATED PARTIAL THROMBOPLASTIN TIME, AND PLATELET COUNT - A COMPARISON BETWEEN WHOLE-BLOOD AND LABORATORY ASSAYS WITH COAGULATION-FACTOR ANALYSIS IN PATIENTS PRESENTING FOR CARDIAC-SURGERY
    DESPOTIS, GJ
    SANTORO, SA
    SPITZNAGEL, E
    KATER, KM
    BARNES, P
    COX, JL
    LAPPAS, DG
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 80 (02) : 338 - 351
  • [13] Use of point-of-care test in identification of patients who can benefit from desmopressin during cardiac surgery: a randomised controlled trial
    Despotis, GJ
    Levine, V
    Saleem, R
    Spitznagel, E
    Joist, JH
    [J]. LANCET, 1999, 354 (9173) : 106 - 110
  • [14] A comparison between continuous infusion versus standard bolus administration of heparin based on monitoring in cardiac surgery
    Despotis, GJ
    Levine, V
    JoinerMaier, D
    Joist, JH
    [J]. BLOOD COAGULATION & FIBRINOLYSIS, 1997, 8 (07) : 419 - 430
  • [15] Despotis GJ, 1997, CLIN CHEM, V43, P1684
  • [16] THE IMPACT OF HEPARIN CONCENTRATION AND ACTIVATED CLOTTING TIME MONITORING ON BLOOD CONSERVATION - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED EVALUATION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CARDIAC OPERATION
    DESPOTIS, GJ
    JOIST, JH
    HOGUE, CW
    ALSOUFIEV, A
    KATER, K
    GOODNOUGH, LT
    SANTORO, SA
    SPITZNAGEL, E
    ROSENBLUM, M
    LAPPAS, DG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1995, 110 (01) : 46 - 54
  • [17] Optical aggregometry versus the PFA-100TM:: experimental studies in pigs treated with propofol
    Escudero, C
    Santos, M
    Buján, J
    Fuente, M
    Honduvilla, NG
    Bañas, E
    Román, JS
    Tendillo, FJ
    [J]. PLATELETS, 2001, 12 (03) : 133 - 137
  • [18] Utility of the PFA-100® for assessing bleeding disorders and monitoring therapy:: a review of analytical variables, benefits and limitations
    Favaloro, EJ
    [J]. HAEMOPHILIA, 2001, 7 (02) : 170 - 179
  • [19] Laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand disorder (vWD) and monitoring of DDAVP therapy:: efficacy of the PFA-100® and vWF:CBA as combined diagnostic strategies
    Favaloro, EJ
    Kershaw, G
    Bukuya, M
    Hertzberg, M
    Koutts, J
    [J]. HAEMOPHILIA, 2001, 7 (02) : 180 - 189
  • [20] The platelet thrombin receptor and postoperative bleeding
    Ferraris, VA
    Ferraris, SP
    Singh, A
    Fuhr, W
    Koppel, D
    McKenna, D
    Rodriguez, E
    Reich, H
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1998, 65 (02) : 352 - 358