Patterns of community integration 2-5 years post-discharge from brain injury rehabilitation

被引:106
作者
Doig, E [1 ]
Fleming, J
Tooth, L
机构
[1] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Brain Injury Rehabil Unit, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Dept Occupat Therapy, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1080/02699050110034343
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is characterized by a high degree of variability which has often been difficult to capture in traditional outcome studies. The purpose of this study was to describe patterns of community integration 2-5 years after TBI. Participants were 208 patients admitted to a Brain Injury Rehabilitation Unit between 1991-1995 in Brisbane, Australia. The design comprised retrospective data collection and questionnaire follow-up by mail. Mean follow-up was 3.5 years. Demographic, injury severity and functional status variables were retrieved from hospital records. Community integration was assessed using the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ), and vocational status measured by a self administered questionnaire. Data was analysed using cluster analysis which divided the data into meaningful subsets. Based on the CIQ subscale scores of home, social and productive integration, a three cluster solution was selected, with groups labelled as working (n = 78), balanced (n = 46) and poorly integrated (n = 84). Although 38% of the sample returned to a high level of productive activity and 22% achieved a balanced lifestyle, overall community integration was poor for the remainder. This poorly integrated group had more severe injury characterized by longer periods of acute care and post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) and greater functional disability on discharge. These findings have implications for service delivery prior to and during the process of reintegration after brain injury.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 762
页数:16
相关论文
共 49 条
[41]  
Tabachnick BG., 1996, USING MULTIVARIATE S, P57
[42]  
TATE RL, 1988, P INT PERSP BRAIN IN, P415
[43]  
TEASDALE G, 1974, LANCET, V2, P81
[44]   Outcomes in traumatic brain injury: Self-report versus report of significant others [J].
Tepper, S ;
Beatty, P ;
DeJong, G .
BRAIN INJURY, 1996, 10 (08) :575-581
[45]   EXPLAINING QUALITY-OF-LIFE FOR PERSONS WITH TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES 2 YEARS AFTER INJURY [J].
WEBB, CR ;
WRIGLEY, M ;
YOELS, W ;
FINE, PR .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1995, 76 (12) :1113-1119
[46]  
WILLER B, 1994, AM J PHYS MED REHAB, V73, P103
[47]  
WILLER B, 1994, BRAIN INJURY REHABIL, P355
[48]  
Willer B., 1993, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, V8, P75, DOI [10.1097/00001199-199308020-00009, DOI 10.1097/00001199-199308020-00009]
[49]   DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF THE ASSESSMENT OF LIVING SKILLS AND RESOURCES (ALSAR) IN ELDERLY COMMUNITY-DWELLING VETERANS [J].
WILLIAMS, JH ;
DRINKA, TJK ;
GREENBERG, JR ;
FARRELLHOLTAN, J ;
EUHARDY, R ;
SCHRAM, M .
GERONTOLOGIST, 1991, 31 (01) :84-91