Tuned-aperture computed tomography versus parallax analog and digital radiographic images in detecting second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first molars

被引:22
作者
Barton, DJ
Clark, SJ
Eleazer, PD
Scheetz, JP
Farman, AG
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Sch Dent, Grad Endodont Clin, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[2] Univ Alabama, Chair Endodont & Pulp Biol, Birmingham, AL USA
来源
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS | 2003年 / 96卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00061-1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective. We sought to evaluate the delectability of second mesiobuccal (MB2) canals in the MB root of maxillary first molar teeth by comparing (1) parallax with pairs of conventional direct-exposure film intraoral radiographs (both D-speed and F-speed), (2) parallax with pairs of charge-coupled device-based digital images acquired through the use of Trophy RVG-ui, and (3) charge-coupled device-based images acquired through the use of a Trophy RVG-ui sensor and tomosynthetically reconstructed by TACT (tuned-aperture computed tomography) Workbench Software. Study design. Maxillary first molars were mounted in simulated bone. Pairs of images were generated by conventional D-speed and F-speed radiography and digital radiography with a charge-coupled device-based sensor, the RVG-ui. Sequences of images were also acquired for TACT reconstruction by using the digital sensor. Observers viewed sets of images to determine the number of canals present within the MB root of each tooth. Roots were horizontally cross-sectioned and viewed under an operating microscope to determine the actual number of canals present. Results. The frequency of detection of MB2 canals was remarkably similar across techniques: 39.2% to 39.6% with parallax for both types of film and for RVG-ui images, and 37.9% with TACT. No statistically significant difference was found in the detectability of MB2 canals between the modalities tested. TACT had higher correlation coefficients than the other 3 modalities with respect to intrarater and interrater reliabilities. Conclusions. (1) There was a less than 40% chance of locating MB2 canals in the MB root of maxillary first molar teeth by using parallax with pairs of digital or analog radiographs. (2) TACT did not significantly affect the rate of detection of MB2 canals.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 228
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries.: A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT™) [J].
Abreu, M ;
Tyndall, DA ;
Platin, E ;
Ludlow, JB ;
Phillips, C .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 28 (03) :152-157
[2]  
[Anonymous], TOOTH MORPHOLOGY ACC
[3]  
LE CT, 1998, APPL CATEGORICAL DAT, P390
[4]   Array-projection geometry and depth discrimination with Tuned-Aperture Computed Tomography for assessing the relationship between tooth roots and the inferior alveolar canal [J].
Morant, RD ;
Eleazer, PD ;
Scheetz, JP ;
Farman, AG .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2001, 91 (02) :252-259
[5]   Detection of artificially induced vertical radicular fractures using tuned aperture computed tomography [J].
Nair, MK ;
Nair, UDP ;
Gröndahl, HG ;
Webber, RL ;
Wallace, JA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 2001, 109 (06) :375-379
[6]   Identification of root canals in molars by tuned-aperture computed tomography [J].
Nance, R ;
Tyndall, D ;
Levin, LG ;
Trope, M .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2000, 33 (04) :392-396
[7]  
Nance RS, 2000, ENDOD DENT TRAUMATOL, V16, P24
[8]   A model for the teaching of clinical techniques in root canal treatment [J].
Nattress, BR ;
Manogue, M ;
Carmichael, F .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 1997, 30 (05) :343-346
[9]   ROENTGENOGRAPHIC INVESTIGATION OF MESIOBUCCAL ROOT OF MAXILLARY FIRST MOLAR [J].
PINEDA, F .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1973, 36 (02) :253-260
[10]   Tuned-aperture computed tomography for detection of occlusal caries [J].
Shi, XQ ;
Han, P ;
Welander, U ;
Angmar-Månsson, B .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2001, 30 (01) :45-49