Iteratively reweighted generalized rank annihilation method 1.: Improved handling of prediction bias

被引:21
作者
Faber, NM [1 ]
Ferré, J [1 ]
Boqué, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rovira & Virgili, Inst Adv Studies, Dept Analyt & Organ Chem, E-43005 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain
关键词
bilinear calibration; GRAM; IRGRAM; prediction bias; bias correction;
D O I
10.1016/S0169-7439(00)00117-9
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The generalized rank annihilation method (CRAM) is a method for curve resolution and calibration that uses two bilinear matrices simultaneously, i.e., one for the unknown and one for the calibration sample. A GRAM calculation amounts to solving an eigenvalue problem for which the eigenvalues are related to the predicted analyte concentrations. Previous studies have shown that random measurement errors bring about a bias in the eigenvalues, which directly translates into prediction bias. In this paper, accurate formulas are derived that enable removing most of this bias. Two bias correction methods are investigated. While the first method directly subtracts bias from the eigenvalues obtained by the original GRAM, the second method first applies a weight to the data matrices to reduce bias. These weights are specific for the analyte of interest and must be determined iteratively from the data. Consequently, the proposed modification is called iteratively reweighted GRAM (IRGRAM). The results of Monte Carlo simulations show that both methods are effective in the sense that the standard error in the bias-corrected prediction compares favourably with the root mean squared error (RMSE) that accompanies the original quantity. However, IRGRAM is found to perform best because the increase of variance caused by subtracting bias is minimised, In the original formulation of GRAM only a single calibration sample is exploited. The error analysis is extended to cope with multiple calibration samples. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 90
页数:24
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   ERROR ANALYSIS OF THE GENERALIZED RANK ANNIHILATION METHOD [J].
BOOKSH, K ;
KOWALSKI, BR .
JOURNAL OF CHEMOMETRICS, 1994, 8 (01) :45-63
[2]  
Carroll RJ., 1995, MEASUREMENT ERROR NO
[3]  
CAWS Peter., 1988, STRUCTURALISM ART IN
[4]   PRINCIPAL COVARIATES REGRESSION .1. THEORY [J].
DEJONG, S ;
KIERS, HAL .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 1992, 14 (1-3) :155-164
[5]  
Denham MC, 2000, J CHEMOMETR, V14, P351, DOI 10.1002/1099-128X(200007/08)14:4<351::AID-CEM598>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-Q
[7]   ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS OF RADIAL BASE FUNCTION AND MULTILAYERED FEEDFORWARD NEURAL-NETWORK MODELS [J].
DERKS, EPPA ;
PASTOR, MSS ;
BUYDENS, LMC .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 1995, 28 (01) :49-60
[8]  
Faber K, 1997, J CHEMOMETR, V11, P95, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-128X(199703)11:2<95::AID-CEM454>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-M
[10]  
Faber K, 1997, J CHEMOMETR, V11, P419, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-128X(199709/10)11:5<419::AID-CEM486>3.0.CO