Current approaches for assessing insulin sensitivity and resistance in vivo: advantages, limitations, and appropriate usage

被引:1139
作者
Muniyappa, Ranganath [1 ]
Lee, Sihoon [1 ]
Chen, Hui [1 ]
Quon, Michael J. [1 ]
机构
[1] NCCAM, NIH, Diabet Unit, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM | 2008年 / 294卷 / 01期
关键词
glucose clamp; quantitative insulin sensitivity check index; minimal model; homeostatis model assessment;
D O I
10.1152/ajpendo.00645.2007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Insulin resistance contributes to the pathophysiology of diabetes and is a hallmark of obesity, metabolic syndrome, and many cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, quantifying insulin sensitivity/resistance in humans and animal models is of great importance for epidemiological studies, clinical and basic science investigations, and eventual use in clinical practice. Direct and indirect methods of varying complexity are currently employed for these purposes. Some methods rely on steady-state analysis of glucose and insulin, whereas others rely on dynamic testing. Each of these methods has distinct advantages and limitations. Thus, optimal choice and employment of a specific method depends on the nature of the studies being performed. Established direct methods for measuring insulin sensitivity in vivo are relatively complex. The hyperinsulinemic euglycemic glucose clamp and the insulin suppression test directly assess insulin-mediated glucose utilization under steady-state conditions that are both labor and time intensive. A slightly less complex indirect method relies on minimal model analysis of a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. Finally, simple surrogate indexes for insulin sensitivity/resistance are available (e. g., QUICKI, HOMA, 1/insulin, Matusda index) that are derived from blood insulin and glucose concentrations under fasting conditions (steady state) or after an oral glucose load (dynamic). In particular, the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) has been validated extensively against the reference standard glucose clamp method. QUICKI is a simple, robust, accurate, reproducible method that appropriately predicts changes in insulin sensitivity after therapeutic interventions as well as the onset of diabetes. In this Frontiers article, we highlight merits, limitations, and appropriate use of current in vivo measures of insulin sensitivity/resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:E15 / E26
页数:12
相关论文
共 104 条
[11]   Orchestration of glucose homeostasis - From a small acorn to the California oak [J].
Bergman, Richard N. .
DIABETES, 2007, 56 (06) :1489-1501
[12]   EXTRAPANCREATIC EFFECT OF SOMATOSTATIN INFUSION TO INCREASE GLUCOSE CLEARANCE [J].
BERGMAN, RN ;
ADER, M ;
FINEGOOD, DT ;
PACINI, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1984, 247 (03) :E370-E379
[13]   Accurate assessment of β-cell function -: The hyperbolic correction [J].
Bergman, RN ;
Ader, M ;
Huecking, K ;
Van Citters, G .
DIABETES, 2002, 51 :S212-S220
[14]   QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATION OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY [J].
BERGMAN, RN ;
IDER, YZ ;
BOWDEN, CR ;
COBELLI, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1979, 236 (06) :E667-E677
[15]   EQUIVALENCE OF THE INSULIN SENSITIVITY INDEX IN MAN DERIVED BY THE MINIMAL MODEL METHOD AND THE EUGLYCEMIC GLUCOSE CLAMP [J].
BERGMAN, RN ;
PRAGER, R ;
VOLUND, A ;
OLEFSKY, JM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1987, 79 (03) :790-800
[16]   OBESITY AND INSULIN RESISTANCE IN HUMANS - A DOSE-RESPONSE STUDY [J].
BONADONNA, RC ;
GROOP, L ;
KRAEMER, N ;
FERRANNINI, E ;
DELPRATO, S ;
DEFRONZO, RA .
METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1990, 39 (05) :452-459
[17]   Homeostasis model assessment closely mirrors the glucose clamp technique in the assessment of insulin sensitivity - Studies in subjects with various degrees of glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity [J].
Bonora, E ;
Saggiani, F ;
Targher, G ;
Zenere, MB ;
Alberiche, M ;
Monauni, T ;
Bonadonna, RC ;
Muggeo, M .
DIABETES CARE, 2000, 23 (01) :57-63
[18]   QUANTIFICATION OF THE RELATIVE IMPAIRMENT IN ACTIONS OF INSULIN ON HEPATIC GLUCOSE-PRODUCTION AND PERIPHERAL GLUCOSE-UPTAKE IN NON-INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES-MELLITUS [J].
CAMPBELL, PJ ;
MANDARINO, LJ ;
GERICH, JE .
METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1988, 37 (01) :15-21
[19]   Undermodeling affects minimal model indexes: insights from a two-compartment model [J].
Caumo, A ;
Vicini, P ;
Zachwieja, JJ ;
Avogaro, A ;
Yarasheski, K ;
Bier, DM ;
Cobelli, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 1999, 276 (06) :E1171-E1193
[20]   HEPATIC GLUCOSE-PRODUCTION DURING THE LABELED IVGTT - ESTIMATION BY DECONVOLUTION WITH A NEW MINIMAL MODEL [J].
CAUMO, A ;
COBELLI, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 264 (05) :E829-E841