How Evolutionary Crystal Structure Prediction Works-and Why

被引:1034
作者
Oganov, Artem R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lyakhov, Andriy O. [1 ,2 ]
Valle, Mario [4 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Geosci, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Phys & Astron, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[3] Moscow MV Lomonosov State Univ, Dept Geol, Moscow 119992, Russia
[4] Swiss Natl Supercomp Ctr CSCS, Data Anal & Visualizat Grp, CH-6928 Manno, Switzerland
关键词
GEOMETRY OPTIMIZATION; PHASE; TRANSITION; HARDNESS; MINIMA;
D O I
10.1021/ar1001318
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Once the crystal structure of a chemical substance is known, many properties can be predicted reliably and routinely. Therefore if researchers could predict the crystal structure of a material before it is synthesized, they could significantly accelerate the discovery of new materials. In addition, the ability to predict crystal structures at arbitrary conditions of pressure and temperature is invaluable for the study of matter at extreme conditions, where experiments are difficult. Crystal structure prediction (CSP), the problem of finding the most stable arrangement of atoms given only the chemical composition, has long remained a major unsolved scientific problem. Two problems are entangled here: search, the efficient exploration of the multidimensional energy landscape, and ranking, the correct calculation of relative energies. For organic crystals, which contain a few molecules in the unit cell, search can be quite simple as long as a researcher does not need to include many possible isomers or conformations of the molecules; therefore ranking becomes the main challenge. For inorganic crystals, quantum mechanical methods often provide correct relative energies, making search the most critical problem. Recent developments provide useful practical methods for solving the search problem to a considerable extent. One can use simulated annealing, metadynamics, random sampling, basin hopping, minima hopping, and data mining. Genetic algorithms have been applied to crystals since 1995, but with limited success, which necessitated the development of a very different evolutionary algorithm. This Account reviews CSP using one of the major techniques, the hybrid evolutionary algorithm USPEX (Universal Structure Predictor: Evolutionary Xtallography). Using recent developments in the theory of energy landscapes, we unravel the reasons evolutionary techniques work for CSP and point out their limitations. We demonstrate that the energy landscapes of chemical systems have an overall shape and explore their intrinsic dimensionalities. Because of the inverse relationships between order and energy and between the dimensionality and diversity of an ensemble of crystal structures, the chances that a random search will find the ground state decrease exponentially with increasing system size. A well-designed evolutionary algorithm allows for much greater computational efficiency. We illustrate the power of evolutionary CSP through applications that examine matter at high pressure, where new, unexpected phenomena take place. Evolutionary CSP has allowed researchers to make unexpected discoveries such as a transparent phase of sodium, a partially ionic form of boron, complex superconducting forms of calcium, a novel superhard allotrope of carbon, polymeric modifications of nitrogen, and a new class of compounds, perhydrides. These methods have also led to the discovery of novel hydride superconductors including the "impossible" LiHn (n = 2, 6, 8) compounds, and CaLi2. We discuss extensions of the method to molecular crystals, systems of variable composition, and the targeted optimization of specific physical properties.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 237
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Improved real-space genetic algorithm for crystal structure and polymorph prediction [J].
Abraham, N. L. ;
Probert, M. I. J. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2008, 77 (13)
[2]   Hydrogen dominant metallic alloys: High temperature superconductors? [J].
Ashcroft, NW .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2004, 92 (18) :187002-1
[3]   EVOLUTIONARY PROGRAMMING TECHNIQUES FOR PREDICTING INORGANIC CRYSTAL-STRUCTURES [J].
BUSH, TS ;
CATLOW, CRA ;
BATTLE, PD .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY, 1995, 5 (08) :1269-1272
[4]   Superconducting behavior in compressed solid SiH4 with a layered structure [J].
Chen, Xiao-Jia ;
Wang, Jiang-Long ;
Struzhkin, Viktor V. ;
Mao, Ho-kwang ;
Hemley, Russell J. ;
Lin, Hai-Qing .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2008, 101 (07)
[5]   MOLECULAR-GEOMETRY OPTIMIZATION WITH A GENETIC ALGORITHM [J].
DEAVEN, DM ;
HO, KM .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1995, 75 (02) :288-291
[6]   Superconductivity under high pressure in the binary compound CaLi2 [J].
Debessai, M. ;
Matsuoka, T. ;
Hamlin, J. J. ;
Gangopadhyay, A. K. ;
Schilling, J. S. ;
Shimizu, K. ;
Ohishi, Y. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2008, 78 (21)
[7]   Crystal structure of SiH4 at high pressure [J].
Degtyareva, Olga ;
Martinez Canales, Miguel ;
Bergara, Aitor ;
Chen, Xiao-Jia ;
Song, Yang ;
Struzhkin, Viktor V. ;
Mao, Ho-kwang ;
Hemley, Russell J. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2007, 76 (06)
[8]   Electrides: From 1D Heisenberg chains to 2D pseudo-metals [J].
Dye, JL .
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY, 1997, 36 (18) :3816-3826
[9]   Structures and potential superconductivity in SiH4 at high pressure:: En route to "metallic hydrogen" -: art. no. 017006 [J].
Feng, J ;
Grochala, W ;
Jaron, T ;
Hoffmann, R ;
Bergara, A ;
Ashcroft, NW .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2006, 96 (01)
[10]   Theoretical indications of singular structural and electronic features of laves-phase CaLi2 under pressure [J].
Feng, Ji ;
Ashcroft, N. W. ;
Hoffmann, Roald .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2007, 98 (24)