Solution of reactive power optimisation including interval uncertainty using genetic algorithm

被引:23
作者
Zhang, Cong [1 ]
Chen, Haoyong [1 ]
Ngan, Honwing [2 ]
Liang, Zipeng [1 ]
Guo, Manlan [1 ]
Hua, Dong [1 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, Sch Elect Engn, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Wanchai, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
reactive power; genetic algorithms; voltage control; load flow; Pareto optimisation; RPO; interval uncertainty; genetic algorithm; reactive power optimisation; optimal profile; power systems; steady state; deterministic sets; demand loads; generation values; uncertain nonlinear programme; power flow calculation; Pareto front; chance-constrained programming method; FLOW;
D O I
10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.1195
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The reactive power optimisation (RPO) is generally used to design an optimal profile of the voltage and reactive power of power systems in the steady state for deterministic sets of demand loads and generation values, and it is a significant procedure in voltage control. However, the input data of a power system is actually uncertain in practise, which makes RPO an uncertain non-linear programme. To address this problem, the input data were considered as intervals, and the RPO incorporating interval uncertainties model was proposed. To solve this model, the genetic algorithm was employed as the solution algorithm, where the reliable power flow calculation was used to judge the constraints of the model. The Pareto front was established as the solution of the proposed model since it has two objective functions, i.e. the midpoint and radius of real power losses. The application of this technique to the uncertain RPO was explained in detail. Two numerical results were analysed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, especially in comparison with the previously proposed chance-constrained programming method.
引用
收藏
页码:3657 / 3664
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Man-in-the-middle attack test-bed investigating cyber-security vulnerabilities in smart grid scada systems
[2]   QUADRATICALLY CONVERGENT OPTIMAL POWER FLOW [J].
BURCHETT, RC ;
HAPP, HH ;
VIERATH, DR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS, 1984, 103 (11) :3267-3271
[3]   Interval optimization for uncertain structures [J].
Chen, SH ;
Wu, J ;
Chen, YD .
FINITE ELEMENTS IN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN, 2004, 40 (11) :1379-1398
[4]   Seeker Optimization Algorithm for Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch [J].
Dai, Chaohua ;
Chen, Weirong ;
Zhu, Yunfang ;
Zhang, Xuexia .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2009, 24 (03) :1218-1231
[5]   A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J].
Deb, K ;
Pratap, A ;
Agarwal, S ;
Meyarivan, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) :182-197
[6]   A Two-Stage Robust Reactive Power Optimization Considering Uncertain Wind Power Integration in Active Distribution Networks [J].
Ding, Tao ;
Liu, Shiyu ;
Yuan, Wei ;
Bie, Zhaohong ;
Zeng, Bo .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2016, 7 (01) :301-311
[7]   OPTIMAL POWER FLOW SOLUTIONS [J].
DOMMEL, HW ;
TINNEY, WF .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS, 1968, PA87 (10) :1866-+
[8]   Optimal capacitor placement in radial distribution networks [J].
Gallego, RA ;
Monticelli, AJ ;
Romero, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2001, 16 (04) :630-637
[9]  
Grabowski D, 2008, ASIA S PACIF DES AUT, P738
[10]   Optimal reactive dispatch through interior point methods [J].
Granville, Sergio .
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1994, 9 (01) :136-146