Updating risk prediction tools: A case study in prostate cancer

被引:24
作者
Ankerst, Donna P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Koniarski, Tim [4 ]
Liang, Yuanyuan [2 ,3 ]
Leach, Robin J. [2 ]
Feng, Ziding [5 ]
Sanda, Martin G. [6 ,7 ]
Partin, Alan W. [8 ,9 ]
Chan, Daniel W. [8 ,9 ]
Kagan, Jacob [10 ]
Sokoll, Lori [8 ,9 ]
Wei, John T. [11 ]
Thompson, Ian M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Muenchen, Dept Math, Unit M4, D-85748 Garching, Germany
[2] UTHSCSA, Dept Urol, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[3] UTHSCSA, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[4] Univ Regensburg, Int Real Estate Business Sch, D-93040 Regensburg, Germany
[5] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Program Biostat & Biomath, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[7] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Prostate Ctr, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[8] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[9] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[10] NCI, Canc Biomarkers Res Grp, Canc Prevent Div, Rockville, MD USA
[11] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Calibration; Discrimination; Net benefit; Prostate cancer prevention trial; Risk prediction; Validation; DECISION CURVE ANALYSIS; OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS; PREVENTION TRIAL; BREAST-CANCER; ROC CURVE; MODELS; MARKER; RECLASSIFICATION; STATISTICS; CALCULATOR;
D O I
10.1002/bimj.201100062
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Online risk prediction tools for common cancers are now easily accessible and widely used by patients and doctors for informed decision-making concerning screening and diagnosis. A practical problem is as cancer research moves forward and new biomarkers and risk factors are discovered, there is a need to update the risk algorithms to include them. Typically, the new markers and risk factors cannot be retrospectively measured on the same study participants used to develop the original prediction tool, necessitating the merging of a separate study of different participants, which may be much smaller in sample size and of a different design. Validation of the updated tool on a third independent data set is warranted before the updated tool can go online. This article reports on the application of Bayes rule for updating risk prediction tools to include a set of biomarkers measured in an external study to the original study used to develop the risk prediction tool. The procedure is illustrated in the context of updating the online Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator to incorporate the new markers %freePSA and [-2]proPSA measured on an external casecontrol study performed in Texas, U.S.. Recent state-of-the art methods in validation of risk prediction tools and evaluation of the improvement of updated to original tools are implemented using an external validation set provided by the U.S. Early Detection Research Network.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 142
页数:16
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Predicting prostate cancer risk through incorporation of prostate cancer gene 3
    Ankerst, Donna Pauler
    Groskopf, Jack
    Day, John R.
    Blase, Amy
    Rittenhouse, Harry
    Pollock, Brad H.
    Tangen, Cathy
    Parekh, Dipen
    Leach, Robin J.
    Thompson, Ian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (04) : 1303 - 1308
  • [2] ANSCOMBE FJ, 1967, J ROY STAT SOC B, V29, P1
  • [3] MODEL UNCERTAINTY, DATA MINING AND STATISTICAL-INFERENCE
    CHATFIELD, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 1995, 158 : 419 - 466
  • [4] COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH
    DELONG, ER
    DELONG, DM
    CLARKEPEARSON, DI
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) : 837 - 845
  • [5] Validation in a Multiple Urology Practice Cohort of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Calculator for Predicting Prostate Cancer Detection
    Eyre, Stephen J.
    Ankerst, Donna P.
    Wei, John T.
    Nair, Prakash V.
    Regan, Meredith M.
    Bueti, Gerrardina
    Tang, Jeffrey
    Rubin, Mark A.
    Kearney, Michael
    Thompson, Ian M.
    Sanda, Martin G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (06) : 2653 - 2658
  • [6] Bayesian inference for finite mixtures of univariate and multivariate skew-normal and skew-t distributions
    Fruehwirth-Schnatter, Sylvia
    Pyne, Saumyadipta
    [J]. BIOSTATISTICS, 2010, 11 (02) : 317 - 336
  • [7] PROJECTING INDIVIDUALIZED PROBABILITIES OF DEVELOPING BREAST-CANCER FOR WHITE FEMALES WHO ARE BEING EXAMINED ANNUALLY
    GAIL, MH
    BRINTON, LA
    BYAR, DP
    CORLE, DK
    GREEN, SB
    SCHAIRER, C
    MULVIHILL, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1989, 81 (24) : 1879 - 1886
  • [8] Projecting individualized absolute invasive breast cancer risk in African American women
    Gail, Mitchell H.
    Costantino, Joseph P.
    Pee, David
    Bondy, Melissa
    Newman, Lisa
    Selvan, Mano
    Anderson, Garnet L.
    Malone, Kathleen E.
    Marchbanks, Polly A.
    McCaskill-Stevens, Worta
    Norman, Sandra A.
    Simon, Michael S.
    Spirtas, Robert
    Ursin, Giske
    Bernstein, Leslie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2007, 99 (23) : 1782 - 1792
  • [9] The need for reorientation toward cost-effective prediction:: Comments on 'Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker:: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond' by M. J.!Pencina et al., Statistics in Medicine
    Greenland, Sander
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (02) : 199 - 206
  • [10] Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines
    Grundy, SM
    Cleeman, JI
    Merz, CNB
    Brewer, HB
    Clark, LT
    Hunninghake, DB
    Pasternak, RC
    Smith, SC
    Stone, NJ
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (02) : 227 - 239