Use of three additional mid biopsies to improve local assessment of prostate cancer in patients with one positive sextant biopsy

被引:10
作者
Salomon, L [1 ]
Colombel, M [1 ]
Patard, JJ [1 ]
Bellot, J [1 ]
Chopin, DK [1 ]
Abbou, CC [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Henri Mondor, Serv Urol M Pr Abbou, Dept Urol, F-94010 Creteil, France
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; biopsy; prognosis;
D O I
10.1159/000019747
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: Routine sextant biopsies have proven useful in the diagnosis and local staging of prostate cancer. A single positive biopsy is more frequently associated with a smaller tumor and a low risk of positive margins. Nevertheless, the risk of positive margins in patients with 1 positive sextant biopsy remains high (20 %). A better assessment of local invasion is therefore needed. In addition to standard sextant biopsies, we routinely obtain 3 additional mid biopsies from the apex to the base of the prostate. The aim of this study is to analyze the contribution of these 3 additional mid biopsies to local staging. Methods: From 1988 to 1996, 177 men underwent sextant biopsies plus 3 additional mid biopsies prior to radical prostatectomy; 59 men had I positive sextant biopsy, and 13 also had 1-3 positive mid biopsies. The pathological results of the prostatectomy specimens from these 13 men (group A) were compared with those of the 46 men with only 1 positive sextant biopsy (group B), by means of the Fisher and Mann-Whitney tests. Results: The two groups were similar in terms of age, preoperative prostate-specific antigen, the Gleason score of positive biopsies, the weight of the specimen, the Gleason specimen score, tumor volume and pathological stage. Positive surgical margins were found in 53.8% of group A and 19.4% of group B patients (p = 0.002). The location of the positive additional biopsies matched that of the positive surgical margins. Conclusions: Additional mid biopsies improve the local assessment of prostate cancer in patients with a single positive sextant biopsy, identifying significantly more positive margins when these additional mid biopsies are positive and indicating the location of the positive surgical margins. These informations could be helpful to avoid positive surgical margins during radical prostatectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 317
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   ANALYSIS OF RISK-FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH PROSTATE-CANCER EXTENSION TO THE SURGICAL MARGIN AND PELVIC NODE METASTASIS AT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY [J].
ACKERMAN, DA ;
BARRY, JM ;
WICKLUND, RA ;
OLSON, N ;
LOWE, BA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (06) :1845-1850
[2]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERINEURAL TUMOR INVASION ON NEEDLE-BIOPSY AND RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY CAPSULAR PENETRATION IN CLINICAL STAGE-B ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE [J].
BASTACKY, SI ;
WALSH, PC ;
EPSTEIN, JI .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1993, 17 (04) :336-341
[3]   THE VOLUME OF PROSTATE-CANCER IN THE BIOPSY SPECIMEN CANNOT RELIABLY PREDICT THE QUANTITY OF CANCER IN THE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMEN ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS [J].
CUPP, MR ;
BOSTWICK, DG ;
MYERS, RP ;
OESTERLING, JE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 153 (05) :1543-1548
[4]   PREDICTIVE VALUE OF CONTRALATERAL BIOPSIES IN UNILATERALLY PALPABLE PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
DANIELS, GF ;
MCNEAL, JE ;
STAMEY, TA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 147 (03) :870-874
[5]   CORE CANCER LENGTH IN ULTRASOUND-GUIDED SYSTEMATIC SEXTANT BIOPSIES - A PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION OF PROSTATE-CANCER VOLUME [J].
DIETRICK, DD ;
MCNEAL, JE ;
STAMEY, TA .
UROLOGY, 1995, 45 (06) :987-992
[6]   PATHOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL FINDINGS TO PREDICT TUMOR EXTENT OF NONPALPABLE (STAGE-T1C) PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
EPSTEIN, JI ;
WALSH, PC ;
CARMICHAEL, M ;
BRENDLER, CB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (05) :368-374
[7]  
ESKEW LA, 1996, EUR UROL, V30, P154
[8]   PREDICTION OF PROGNOSIS FOR PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA BY COMBINED HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND CLINICAL STAGING [J].
GLEASON, DF ;
MELLINGE.GT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1974, 111 (01) :58-64
[9]  
GUILLONEAU B, 1996, EUR UROL, V30, P62
[10]  
Harewood Laurence M., 1996, Journal of Urology, V155, p424A