Constraints of artificial neural networks for rainfall-runoff modelling: trade-offs in hydrological state representation and model evaluation

被引:140
作者
de Vos, NJ [1 ]
Rientjes, THM
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Water Resources Sect, Delft, Netherlands
[2] ITC, Dept Water Resources, Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.5194/hess-9-111-2005
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The application of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) in rainfall-runoff modelling needs to be researched more extensively in order to appreciate and fulfil the potential of this modelling approach. This paper reports on the application of multi-layer feedforward ANNs for rainfall-runoff modelling of the Geer catchment (Belgium) using both daily and hourly data. The daily forecast results indicate that ANNs can be considered good alternatives for traditional rainfall-runoff modelling approaches, but the simulations based on hourly data reveal timing errors as a result of a dominating autoregressive component. This component is introduced in model simulations by using previously observed runoff values as ANN model input, which is a popular method for indirectly representing the hydrological state of a catchment. Two possible solutions to this problem of lagged predictions are presented. Firstly, several alternatives for representation of the hydrological state are tested as ANN inputs: moving averages over time of observed discharges and rainfall, and the output of the simple GR4J model component for soil moisture. A combination of these hydrological state representers produces good results in terms of timing, but the overall goodness of fit is not as good as the simulations with previous runoff data. Secondly, the possibility of using multiple measures of model performance during ANN training is mentioned.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 126
页数:16
相关论文
共 53 条
[31]   OPTIMIZATION BY SIMULATED ANNEALING [J].
KIRKPATRICK, S ;
GELATT, CD ;
VECCHI, MP .
SCIENCE, 1983, 220 (4598) :671-680
[32]   REAL-TIME FORECASTING WITH A CONCEPTUAL HYDROLOGIC MODEL .2. APPLICATIONS AND RESULTS [J].
KITANIDIS, PK ;
BRAS, RL .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1980, 16 (06) :1034-1044
[33]   Development and test of the distributed HBV-96 hydrological model [J].
Lindstrom, G ;
Johansson, B ;
Persson, M ;
Gardelin, M ;
Bergstrom, S .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1997, 201 (1-4) :272-288
[34]   Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives [J].
Madsen, H .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2000, 235 (3-4) :276-288
[35]   Artificial neural networks as rainfall-runoff models [J].
Minns, AW ;
Hall, MJ .
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 1996, 41 (03) :399-417
[36]  
MINNS AW, 1998, THESIS ROTTERDAM
[37]  
Nash J.E., 1970, J Hydrol, V10, P282, DOI DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
[38]   Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation [J].
Perrin, C ;
Michel, C ;
Andréassian, V .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2003, 279 (1-4) :275-289
[39]   Modeling of the daily rainfall-runoff relationship with artificial neural network [J].
Rajurkar, MP ;
Kothyari, UC ;
Chaube, UC .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2004, 285 (1-4) :96-113
[40]   Flux parameterization in the representative elementary watershed approach: Application to a natural basin [J].
Reggiani, P ;
Rientjes, THM .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2005, 41 (04) :1-18