Comparing self-management of oral anticoagulant therapy with clinic management -: A randomized trial

被引:139
作者
Menéndez-Jándula, B
Souto, JC
Oliver, A
Montserrat, I
Quintana, M
Glch, I
Bonfill, X
Fontcuberta, J
机构
[1] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Unitat Hemostasia & Trombosi, Barcelona 08025, Spain
[2] Fdn Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-142-1-200501040-00006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: control of oral anticoagulant treatment has been reported to be suboptimal, but previous studies suggest that patient self-management improves control. Objective: To compare the quality of control and the clinical outcomes of oral anticoagulant treatment in self-managed patients versus patients following conventional management. Design: Randomized, controlled trial. Setting: University-affiliated hospital in Spain. Patients: 737 patients with indications for anticoagulant treatment. Intervention: The self-management group (n = 368) received simple instructions for using a portable coagulometer weekly and self-adjusting treatment dose. The conventional management group (n = 369) received usual care in an anticoagulation clinic (monthly measurement and control of international normalized ratio [INR], managed by hematologists). Measurements: Percentage of INR values within the target range and major related complications. Results: The median follow-up period was 11.8 months (range, 0.3 to 16.9 months). The unadjusted percentages of in-range INRs were 58.6% in the self-management group and 55.6% in the conventional management group (difference, 3.0 percentage points [95% CI, 0.4 to 5.4 percentage points]). Twenty-seven patients (7.3%) in the conventional management group and 8 (2.2%) in the self-management group had major complications related to anticoagulant treatment. The unadjusted risk difference for major complications between groups was 5.1 percentage points (exact 95% CI, 1.7 to 8.5 percentage points). Fewer patients had minor hemorrhages in the self-management group (14.9%) than in the conventional management group (36.4%). Fifteen patients (4.1%) in the conventional management group and 6 (1.6%) in the self-management group died (unadjusted risk difference, 2.5 percentage points [exact 95% CI, 0.0 to 5.1 percentage points]). Limitations: The trial was performed at only 1 center and was not blinded. The dropout rate in the intervention group was 21%. Conclusions: Compared with conventional management by an anticoagulation clinic, self-management of oral anticoagulant treatment achieved a similar level of control. Of note, major complications and minor hemorrhages were less common in the self-management group.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]   Training of patients for self-management of oral anticoagulant therapy:: Standards, patient suitability, and clinical aspects [J].
Mörsdorf, S ;
Erdlenbruch, W ;
Taborski, U ;
Schenk, JF ;
Erdlenbruch, K ;
Novotny-Reichert, G ;
Krischek, B ;
Wenzel, E .
SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 1999, 25 (01) :109-115
[22]  
MULLERBEISSENHI.W, 1997, J LAB MED, V21, P558
[23]   Training for patients in a randomised controlled trial of self management of warfarin treatment [J].
Murray, E ;
Fitzmaurice, D ;
McCahon, D ;
Fuller, C ;
Sandhur, H .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7437) :437-438
[24]  
Palareti G, 1997, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V78, P1438
[25]   Bleeding complications of oral anticoagulant treatment: An inception-cohort, prospective collaborative study (ISCOAT) [J].
Palareti, G ;
Leali, N ;
Coccheri, S ;
Poggi, M ;
Manotti, C ;
DAngelo, A ;
Pengo, V ;
Erba, N ;
Moia, M ;
Ciavarella, N ;
Devote, G ;
Berrettini, M ;
Musolesi, S .
LANCET, 1996, 348 (9025) :423-428
[26]  
Piette JD, 2001, EVIDENCE BASED DIABE, P207
[27]   The quality of oral anticoagulation before, during and after a period of patient self-management [J].
Piso, B ;
Jimenz-Boj, E ;
Krinninger, B ;
Watzke, HH .
THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2002, 106 (02) :101-104
[28]  
ROSENDAAL FR, 1993, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V69, P236
[29]   Relationship between test frequency and outcomes of anticoagulation: A literature review and commentary with implications for the design of randomized trials of patient self-management [J].
Samsa, GP ;
Matchar, DB .
JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2000, 9 (03) :283-292
[30]   A structured teaching and self-management program for patients receiving oral anticoagulation - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Sawicki, PT .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (02) :145-150