Potentiation of pathogen-specific defense mechanisms in Arabidopsis by β-aminobutyric acid

被引:349
作者
Zimmerli, L [1 ]
Jakab, C [1 ]
Métraux, JP [1 ]
Mauch-Mani, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fribourg, Dept Biol, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1073/pnas.230416897
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The nonprotein amino acids gamma -aminobutyric acid (GABA) and beta -aminobutyric acid (BABA) have known biological effects in animals and plants. Their mode of action has been the object of thorough research in animals but remains unclear in plants. Our objective was to study the mode of action of BABA in the protection of Arabidopis plants against virulent pathogens. BABA protected Arabidopsis against the oomycete pathogen Peronospora parasitica through activation of natural defense mechanisms of the plant such as callose deposition, the hypersensitive response, and the formation of trailing necroses. BABA was still fully protective against P. parasitica in transgenic plants or mutants impaired in the salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and ethylene signaling pathways. Treatment with BABA did not induce the accumulation of mRNA of the systemic acquired resistance (SAR)-associated PR-1 and the ethylene- and jasmonic acid-dependent PDF1.2 genes. However, BABA potentiated the accumulation of PR-1 mRNA after attack by virulent pathogenic bacteria. As a result, BABA-treated Arabidopsis plants were less diseased compared with the untreated control. In the case of bacteria, BABA protected mutants insensitive to jasmonic acid and ethylene but was not active in plants impaired in the SAR transduction pathway. Thus, BABA protects Arabidopsis against different virulent pathogens by potentiating pathogen-specific plant resistance mechanisms. In addition, we provide evidence that BABA-mediated papilla formation after P. parasitica infection is independent of the SAR signaling pathway.
引用
收藏
页码:12920 / 12925
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]   Systemic acquired resistance in Arabidopsis requires salicylic acid but not ethylene [J].
Lawton, K ;
Weymann, K ;
Friedrich, L ;
Vernooij, B ;
Uknes, S ;
Ryals, J .
MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS, 1995, 8 (06) :863-870
[22]   Benzothiadiazole induces disease resistance in Arabidopsis by activation of the systemic acquired resistance signal transduction pathway [J].
Lawton, KA ;
Friedrich, L ;
Hunt, M ;
Weymann, K ;
Delaney, T ;
Kessmann, H ;
Staub, T ;
Ryals, J .
PLANT JOURNAL, 1996, 10 (01) :71-82
[23]  
MAUCHMANI B, 1994, MOL PLANT MICROBE IN, V7, P378, DOI 10.1094/MPMI-7-0378
[24]   INCREASE IN SALICYLIC-ACID AT THE ONSET OF SYSTEMIC ACQUIRED-RESISTANCE IN CUCUMBER [J].
METRAUX, JP ;
SIGNER, H ;
RYALS, J ;
WARD, E ;
WYSSBENZ, M ;
GAUDIN, J ;
RASCHDORF, K ;
SCHMID, E ;
BLUM, W ;
INVERARDI, B .
SCIENCE, 1990, 250 (4983) :1004-1006
[25]   Salicylic acid potentiates defence gene expression in tissue exhibiting acquired resistance to pathogen attack [J].
Mur, LAJ ;
Naylor, G ;
Warner, SAJ ;
Sugars, JM ;
White, RF ;
Draper, J .
PLANT JOURNAL, 1996, 9 (04) :559-571
[26]   A REVISED MEDIUM FOR RAPID GROWTH AND BIO ASSAYS WITH TOBACCO TISSUE CULTURES [J].
MURASHIGE, T ;
SKOOG, F .
PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 1962, 15 (03) :473-497
[27]   Local and systemic induced resistance to the root-knot nematode in tomato by DL-β-Amino-n-butyric acid [J].
Oka, Y ;
Cohen, Y ;
Spiegel, Y .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1999, 89 (12) :1138-1143
[28]   PHENOTYPIC CHARACTERIZATION AND MOLECULAR MAPPING OF THE ARABIDOPSIS-THALIANA LOCUS RPP5, DETERMINING DISEASE RESISTANCE TO PERONOSPORA-PARASITICA [J].
PARKER, JE ;
SZABO, V ;
STASKAWICZ, BJ ;
LISTER, C ;
DEAN, C ;
DANIELS, MJ ;
JONES, JDG .
PLANT JOURNAL, 1993, 4 (05) :821-831
[29]   Pathogen-induced systemic activation of a plant defensin gene in Arabidopsis follows a salicylic acid-independent pathway [J].
Penninckx, IAMA ;
Eggermont, K ;
Terras, FRG ;
Thomma, BPHJ ;
DeSamblanx, GW ;
Buchala, A ;
Metraux, JP ;
Manners, JM ;
Broekaert, WF .
PLANT CELL, 1996, 8 (12) :2309-2323
[30]   Dead cells do tell tales [J].
Richberg, MH ;
Aviv, DH ;
Dangl, JL .
CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY, 1998, 1 (06) :480-485