Modeling Corporate Citizenship, Organizational Trust, and Work Engagement Based on Attachment Theory

被引:131
作者
Lin, Chieh-Peng [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Business & Management, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
corporate citizenship; discretionary citizenship; ethical citizenship; organizational trust; work engagement; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; UNITED-STATES; PERFORMANCE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SATISFACTION; STRATEGY; LOYALTY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-009-0279-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study proposes a research model based on attachment theory, which examines the role of corporate citizenship in the formation of organizational trust and work engagement. In the model, work engagement is directly influenced by four dimensions of perceived corporate citizenship, including economic, legal, ethical, and discretionary citizenship, while work engagement is also indirectly affected by perceived corporate citizenship through the mediation of organizational trust. Empirical testing using a survey of personnel from 12 large firms confirms most of our hypothesized effects. Finally, theoretical and managerial implications of our findings are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 531
页数:15
相关论文
共 67 条
[61]  
2-7
[62]   Corporate Foundations: Their Role for Corporate Social Responsibility [J].
Westhues, Martina ;
Einwiller, Sabine .
CORPORATE REPUTATION REVIEW, 2006, 9 (02) :144-153
[63]   Political and Economic Arguments for Corporate Social Responsibility: Analysis and a Proposition Regarding the CSR Agenda [J].
Weyzig, Francis .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2009, 86 (04) :417-428
[64]   Impact of nurses' job satisfaction on organizational trust [J].
Williams, LL .
HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2005, 30 (03) :203-211
[65]  
Williamson OliverE., 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capital
[66]   CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE REVISITED [J].
WOOD, DJ .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1991, 16 (04) :691-718
[67]   CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL-EFFECTIVENESS - A MULTIVARIATE APPROACH [J].
ZAHRA, SA ;
LATOUR, MS .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 1987, 6 (06) :459-467