Beyond network power? The dynamics of formal economic integration in Northeast Asia

被引:27
作者
Aggarwal, VK
Koo, MG
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, APEC Study Ctr, BASC, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Polit Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Haas Sch Business, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
bilateral and minilateral regionalism; bilateral and minilateral transregionalism; interregionalism; multilateral globalism; preferential trade arrangements; institutional bargaining game; Northeast Asian Free Trade Arrangement;
D O I
10.1080/09512740500162964
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
At the turn of the new millennium, the traditional institutional equilibrium of East Asian economic integration - the embrace of the WTO at the multilateral level and a focus on market-driven, informal integration at the regional level - is under heavy strain. A growing number of Northeast and Southeast Asian countries are pursuing greater institutionalization at the sub-multilateral level, actively weaving a web of preferential trading arrangements. To examine this development, we focus on the likely new institutional equilibrium in Northeast Asia and its implications for East Asia and beyond. We first examine the various political and economic arguments that have been advanced to explain states' desire to pursue 'regionalism'. From our perspective, most conventional explanations fail to adequately differentiate various forms of trading arrangements, thereby impairing both theoretical and empirical analysis of trading arrangements. To remedy this lacuna, we develop a more fine-grained typology of different modes of trade management - unilateral, bilateral, minilateral and multilateral. We then discuss an institutional bargaining-game approach focusing on goods, countries' individual situations and the fit with existing arrangements. This approach is used to analyze how trade arrangements evolved in East Asia in the 1990s, particularly after the Asian financial crisis. We then explore several paths that might lead to formal economic integration in Northeast Asia. Finally, we consider other possible outcomes beyond Northeast Asia.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 216
页数:28
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [31] GROSSMAN GM, 1995, AM ECON REV, V85, P667
  • [32] Haas ErnstB., 1958, UNITING EUROPE POLIT
  • [34] HAGGARD S, 1997, POLITICAL EC REGIONA
  • [35] HATCH W, 1998, GROUNDING ASIAS FLYI
  • [36] Hatch W., 1996, ASIA JAPANS EMBRACE
  • [37] HATSUSE R, 1999, GLOBALISM REGIONALIS
  • [38] Hettne Bjorn., 2000, NEW POLIT ECON, V5, P457, DOI [10.1080/713687778, DOI 10.1080/713687778]
  • [39] Hettne Bjorn., 1994, NEW REGIONALISM IMPL
  • [40] HIGGOTT R, 1995, PACIFIC COOPERATION