Displacement amplitude of ultrasonic scaler inserts

被引:34
作者
Lea, SC [1 ]
Landini, G [1 ]
Walmsley, AD [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Dent, Birmingham B4 6NN, W Midlands, England
关键词
scanning laser vibrometer; ultrasonics; periodontology; ultrasonic generators;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.00012.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: Scanning laser vibrometry is a noninvasive method of measuring the velocity, displacement amplitude and oscillation frequency of vibrating objects. The purpose of this study was to assess, using a scanning laser vibrometer (SLV), the performance of different designs of commercially available ultrasonic scaler generators by measuring the oscillatory characteristics of various scaler tips. Methods: Four ultrasonic generators were tested (Cavitron SPS and Cavitron Select (Dentsply, York, PA, USA) and Piezon Master 400 and Mini Piezon (Electro-Medical Systems, Switzerland)) with various designs of scaler tip. The tips were positioned with their anterior surface perpendicular to the direction of the laser. A graduated scale, placed over the manufacturer's power dial, enabled incremental power setting selection. For each power setting, the laser beam from the SLV was scanned over the surface of the oscillating tip. Results: The ranges of longitudinal displacement amplitudes (in micrometres) were as follows: Mini Piezon (P-tip): 12.90+/-1.44 to 44.03+/-7.80; Piezon Master 400 (P-tip): 16.02+/-2.66 to 35.85+/-5.29; Cavitron SPS (TFI-10 tip): 7.81+/-0.51 to 29.70+/-1.12; Cavitron Select (TFI-10 tip): 13.13+/-1.44 to 33.77+/-4.27; Cavitron SPS (TFI-3 tip): 5.50+/-0.46 to 31.35+/-3.62. Conclusions: This study shows that there are differences between commercially available generators and that tip movement varies between tips of the same style as well as between the generator and tip design. Users of ultrasonic scalers should be made aware of this inherent variability that may influence clinical procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:505 / 510
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   EFFECT OF NON-SURGICAL PERIODONTAL THERAPY .1. MODERATELY ADVANCED PERIODONTITIS [J].
BADERSTEN, A ;
NILVEUS, R ;
EGELBERG, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1981, 8 (01) :57-72
[2]   COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF ULTRASONIC AND HAND SCALING FOR THE REMOVAL OF SUBGINGIVAL PLAQUE AND CALCULUS [J].
BREININGER, DR ;
OLEARY, TJ ;
BLUMENSHINE, RVH .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1987, 58 (01) :9-18
[3]   A comparative in vitro study of a magnetostrictive and a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling instrument [J].
Busslinger, A ;
Lampe, K ;
Beuchat, M ;
Lehmann, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2001, 28 (07) :642-649
[4]   Working parameters of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro [J].
Flemmig, TF ;
Petersilka, GJ ;
Mehl, A ;
Hickel, R ;
Klaiber, B .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1998, 69 (05) :547-553
[5]   The effect of working parameters on root substance removal using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler in vitro [J].
Flemmig, TF ;
Petersilka, GJ ;
Mehl, A ;
Hickel, R ;
Klaiber, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1998, 25 (02) :158-163
[6]   Acoustic microstreaming: Detection and measurement around ultrasonic scalers [J].
Khambay, BS ;
Walmsley, AD .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1999, 70 (06) :626-631
[7]   ULTRASOUND IN DENTISTRY .1. BIOPHYSICAL INTERACTIONS [J].
LAIRD, WRE ;
WALMSLEY, AD .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1991, 19 (01) :14-17
[8]   Vibration characteristics of ultrasonic scalers assessed with scanning laser vibrometry [J].
Lea, SC ;
Landini, G ;
Walmsley, AD .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2002, 30 (04) :147-151
[9]   AN EVALUATION OF BASIC PERIODONTAL THERAPY USING SONIC AND ULTRASONIC SCALERS [J].
LOOS, B ;
KIGER, R ;
EGELBERG, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1987, 14 (01) :29-33
[10]   DISPLACEMENT AMPLITUDE AS A MEASURE OF THE ACOUSTIC OUTPUT OF ULTRASONIC SCALERS [J].
WALMSLEY, AD ;
LAIRD, WRE ;
WILLIAMS, AR .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1986, 2 (03) :97-100