Curative laparoscopic resection for pancreatic neoplasms:: A critical analysis from a single institution

被引:167
作者
Fernandez-Cruz, Laureano
Cosa, Rebeca
Blanco, Laia
Levi, Sammy
Lopez-Boado, Miguel-Angel
Navarro, Salvador
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin, Dept Surg, E-08036 Barcelona, Spain
[2] ICMD Hosp Clin Barcelona, Dept Surg, Barcelona 08036, Spain
[3] ICMD Hosp Clin Barcelona, Dept Gastroenterol, Barcelona 08036, Spain
关键词
laparoscopic pancreatic surgery; laparoscopic pancreatic malignancies; laparoscopic neuroendocrine tumors; laparoscopic cystic neoplasms; laparoscopic pancreatic techniques; laparoscopic pancreatic complications;
D O I
10.1007/s11605-007-0266-0
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery (LPS) has seen significant development but much of the knowledge refers to small and benign pancreatic tumors. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and long-term outcome of the laparoscopic approach in patients with benign, premalignant, and overt malignant lesions of the pancreas. This study, currently, is the largest single center experience worldwide. One hundred twenty-three consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic pancreatic surgery from April 1998 to April 2007, 20 patients with cysts or pseudocysts for acute and chronic pancreatitis, laparoscopic pancreatic drainage was performed, and were excluded from the analysis. The 103 patients were divided based on preoperative diagnosis: group I, inflammatory tumors for chronic pancreatitis (eight patients); group II, cystic pancreatic neoplasms (29 patients); group III, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (10 patients); group IV, neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors (NETs) (43 patients); and group V ductal adenocarcinoma (13 patients). The median tumor size was 5.3 cm. Pathologic data include R (0) or R (1) resection (transection margins on the specimen were inked). Perioperative data, postoperative complications, and resection modalities were compared using statistical analysis. Long-term outcomes were analysed by tumor recurrence and patient survival. The overall conversion rate was 7%. Laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection was performed in 82 patients (79.6%). Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (Lap SPDP) was performed in 52 patients (63.7%), but with splenic vessels preservation in 22% and without splenic vessels preservation in 41.5%. Laparoscopic en-bloc splenopancreatectomy (Lap SxDP) was performed in 30 patients (36.6%) and laparoscopic enucleation (Lap En) in 20 patients (19.4%). There was no mortality. The overall complication rate was 25.2, 16.7, and 40% after Lap SPDP, Lap SxDP, and Lap En, respectively. The overall morbidity rate was significantly higher (p > 0.05) in the group of Lap SPDP without splenic vessels preservation comparing with Lap SPDP with splenic vessels preservation because of the occurrence of splenic complications (20.6%). The overall pancreatic fistulas was 7.7, 10, and 35% after Lap SPDP, Lap SxDP, and Lap En, respectively; the severity of fistula was significantly higher in the Lap En group (p > 0.05). The mean hospital stay was within 1 week in all groups, except in the group of ductal adenocarcinoma, which is 8 days. In this series, 27 patients (26.2%) had malignant disease. R (0) resection was achieved in 90% of ductal adenocarcinoma and 100% for other malignant tumors. The median survival for ductal adenocarcinoma patients was 14 months. This series demonstrates that LPS is feasible and safe in benign-appearing and malignant lesions of the pancreas.
引用
收藏
页码:1607 / 1621
页数:15
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [41] Prognostic factors after distal pancreatectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for invasive pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the body and tail
    Shimada, K
    Sakamoto, Y
    Sano, T
    Kosuge, T
    [J]. SURGERY, 2006, 139 (03) : 288 - 295
  • [42] Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery - Current indications and surgical results
    Shimizu, S
    Tanaka, M
    Konomi, H
    Mizumoto, K
    Yamaguchi, K
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2004, 18 (03): : 402 - 406
  • [43] The value of splenic preservation with distal pancreatectomy
    Shoup, M
    Brennan, MF
    McWhite, K
    Leung, DHY
    Klimstra, D
    Conlon, KC
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2002, 137 (02) : 164 - 168
  • [44] Is extended resection for adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas justified?
    Shoup, M
    Conlon, KC
    Klimstra, D
    Brennan, MF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2003, 7 (08) : 946 - 950
  • [45] Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy
    Strasberg, SM
    Drebin, JA
    Linehan, D
    [J]. SURGERY, 2003, 133 (05) : 521 - 527
  • [46] Distal pancreatectomy: Is staple closure beneficial?
    Takeuchi, K
    Tsuzuki, Y
    Ando, T
    Sekihara, M
    Hara, T
    Kori, T
    Nakajima, H
    Kuwano, H
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 73 (11) : 922 - 925
  • [47] Cystadenomas of the pancreas - Is enucleation an adequate operation?
    Talamini, MA
    Moesinger, R
    Yeo, CJ
    Poulose, B
    Hruban, RH
    Cameron, JL
    Pitt, HA
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 227 (06) : 896 - 901
  • [48] Pancreatic cancer: surgery alone is not sufficient
    Traverso, LW
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2006, 20 (Suppl 2): : 446 - 449
  • [49] Serous cystadenoma of the pancreas - Tumor growth rates and recommendations for treatment
    Tseng, JF
    Warshaw, AL
    Sahani, DV
    Lauwers, GY
    Rattner, DW
    Castillo, CF
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2005, 242 (03) : 413 - 421
  • [50] Case-control comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy
    Velanovich, V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2006, 10 (01) : 95 - 98