Quantitative measurement of ultrasound disruption of polymer-shelled microbubbles

被引:24
作者
Bevan, Peter D.
Karshafian, Raffj
Tickner, E. Glenn
Burns, Peter N.
机构
[1] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Biophys, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Point Biomed Corp, San Carlos, CA USA
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
ultrasound; contrast agents; microbubbles; bubble disruption; Nonlinear ultrasound imaging;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.05.013
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The goal of this study was to assess the threshold of disruption and subsequent time-course of acoustic response of four experimental nitrogen-filled polymer-shelled microbubbles. Using an in vitro measurement system, a sequence of low-amplitude detection pulses measured the change in echo caused by a high-amplitude disruption pulse on a dilute suspension of bubbles. Detection pulses were transmitted 0.5 ms before disruption and between I and 200 ms after disruption. Separate transducers, aligned confocally and orthogonally, were used to transmit and receive bubble echoes. After disruption, all agents demonstrated a transient increase in scattered power. Above the disruption threshold, highly echogenic, nonlinear scatterers were observed. Their echoes slowly disappeared after disruption with median decay times from 7.4 to 13.6 ms, calculated by fitting to a monoexponential decay. This is consistent with a process wherein the shell is disrupted, releasing the gas and generating free gas bubbles, which cause high-amplitude nonlinear scattering followed by relatively slow diffusion of the gas into solution. This picture has been observed optically with single bubbles and differs from the concept of "stimulated acoustic emission" from disrupted bubbles. (E-mail: burns @sri.utoronto.ca) (c) 2007 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.
引用
收藏
页码:1777 / 1786
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Stimulated acoustic emission imaging ("sono-scintigraphy") with the ultrasound contrast agent Levovist: A reproducible Doppler ultrasound effect with potential clinical utility [J].
Blomley, M ;
Albrecht, T ;
Cosgrove, D ;
Jayaram, V ;
Patel, N ;
Butler-Barnes, J ;
Eckersley, R ;
Bauer, A ;
Schlief, R .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1998, 5 :S236-S239
[2]   High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction [J].
Bouakaz, A ;
Versluis, M ;
de Jong, N .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 31 (03) :391-399
[3]  
BURNS PN, 1992, RADIOLOGY, V185, P142
[4]  
Burns PN, 1994, P IEEE ULTRASON S, V3, P1547
[5]  
BURNS PN, 2004, P ANN M RAD SOC N AM, P475
[6]   Threshold of fragmentation for ultrasonic contrast agents [J].
Chomas, JE ;
Dayton, P ;
May, D ;
Ferrara, K .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2001, 6 (02) :141-150
[7]   Basic acoustic properties of microbubbles [J].
de Jong, N ;
Bouakaz, A ;
Frinking, P .
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES, 2002, 19 (03) :229-240
[8]  
DEJONG N, 1996, P IEEE ULTR S, P1449
[9]   ON THE STABILITY OF GAS BUBBLES IN LIQUID-GAS SOLUTIONS [J].
EPSTEIN, PS ;
PLESSET, MS .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1950, 18 (11) :1505-1509
[10]   Delineation of experimental liver tumors in rabbits by a new ultrasound contrast agent and stimulated acoustic emission [J].
Hauff, P ;
Fritzsch, T ;
Reinhardt, M ;
Weitschies, W ;
Luders, F ;
Uhlendorf, V ;
Heldmann, D .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1997, 32 (02) :94-99