Behavioural changes after different stress paradigms: prepulse inhibition increased after physical, but not emotional stress

被引:55
作者
Pijlman, FTA
Herremans, AHJ
van de Kieft, J
Kruse, CG
van Ree, JM
机构
[1] Rudolf Magnus Inst Neurosci, Dept Pharmacol & Anat, UMC Utrecht, NL-3508 AB Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Solvay Pharmaceut, Weesp, Netherlands
关键词
stress; prepulse inhibition; dopamine; locomotor activity; animal;
D O I
10.1016/S0924-977X(03)00040-3
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Physical (PS) and emotional (ES) stress have opposite long-term effects on open field behaviour, i.e., response to novelty. PS induced a long-term reduction in locomotor activity, while ES increased it. Additionally, sensitivity to rewarding stimuli was differentially affected by PS and ES. Whether the stress effects were specific for locomotor activity and reward or if these two stress treatments also have differential effects on other behaviours and brain functions is not known. In the present study, temperature regulation, sensory gating, learning capacity. locomotor activity and coping style were examined. PS consisted of a repeated mild foot shock treatment, which the ES animals witnessed. The tests pose additional challenges, to which all groups can respond differently depending on their previous experience. All tests were performed several days after the last stress treatment. Stress effects were specifically observed on locomotor activity. startle response and prepulse inhibition (PPI). The PS animals showed a potentiated inhibition of the startle when a prepulse (PPI) was used, although the initial startle response was already significantly lower than that of controls. ES animals did not differ from controls on PPI and startle. Additionally PS animals showed an initial decrease in activity, which turned into an increase when the tests continued. ES showed a constant increase in activity compared to controls. Stress effects on the tests for other brain processes and behaviour were not found. In addition, PS animals appeared to be less sensitive to the dopamine agonist apomorphine than control animal. In summary. physical and emotional stress induce differential changes on locomotor activity, startle response and PPI. Underlying mechanisms explaining the differences in stress effects are discussed, i.e., the role of the mesolimbic dopamine system and opioid systems. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V./ECNP. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 380
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Reversal of isolation rearing-induced deficits in prepulse inhibition by seroquel and olanzapine [J].
Bakshi, VP ;
Swerdlow, NR ;
Braff, DL ;
Geyer, MA .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 43 (06) :436-445
[2]   GEPIRONE AND 1-(2-PYRIMIDINYL)-PIPERAZINE-INDUCED REDUCTION OF AVERSIVELY EVOKED ULTRASONIC VOCALIZATION IN THE RAT [J].
CULLEN, WK ;
ROWAN, MJ .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1994, 48 (01) :301-306
[3]   SENSITIZATION OF THE ACOUSTIC STARTLE REFLEX BY FOOTSHOCK [J].
DAVIS, M .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1989, 103 (03) :495-503
[4]   Footshock-induced sensitization of the acoustic startle response in two strains of mice [J].
Dirks, A ;
de Jongh, R ;
Groenink, L ;
van der Gugten, J ;
Hijzen, TH ;
Olivier, B .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2001, 123 (01) :17-21
[5]  
ELLENBROEK BA, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P7604
[6]   The effects of an early stressful life event on sensorimotor gating in adult rats [J].
Ellenbroek, BA ;
van den Kroonenberg, PTJM ;
Cools, AR .
SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 1998, 30 (03) :251-260
[7]   Behavior and body temperature in rats following chronic foot shock or psychological stress exposure [J].
Endo, Y ;
Shiraki, K .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2000, 71 (3-4) :263-268
[8]   The effects of intra-accumbens neurotensin on sensorimotor gating [J].
Feifel, D ;
Minor, KL ;
Dulawa, S ;
Swerdlow, NR .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1997, 760 (1-2) :80-84
[9]   Differential effects of psychological stress on activation of the 5-hydroxytryptamine- and dopamine-containing neurons in the brain of freely moving rats [J].
Funada, M ;
Hara, C .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2001, 901 (1-2) :247-251
[10]   Effects of stress and shock anticipation on prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex [J].
Grillon, C ;
Davis, M .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 34 (05) :511-517