Response Rates in Organizational Science, 1995-2008: A Meta-analytic Review and Guidelines for Survey Researchers

被引:263
作者
Anseel, Frederik [1 ]
Lievens, Filip [1 ]
Schollaert, Eveline [1 ]
Choragwicka, Beata [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Personnel Management & Work & Org Psychol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Dept Social Psychol, Santiago De Compostela, Galicia, Spain
关键词
Response rate; Response enhancing technique; Survey; Respondent type; Sample; Meta-analysis; MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE; SURVEY PARTICIPATION; SURVEY NONRESPONSE; INCENTIVES; WEB;
D O I
10.1007/s10869-010-9157-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study expands upon existing knowledge of response rates by conducting a large-scale quantitative review of published response rates. This allowed a fine-grained comparison of response rates across respondent groups. Other unique features of this study are the analysis of response enhancing techniques across respondent groups and response rate trends over time. In order to aid researchers in designing surveys, we provide expected response rate percentiles for different survey modalities. We analyzed 2,037 surveys, covering 1,251,651 individual respondents, published in 12 journals in I/O Psychology, Management, and Marketing during the period 1995-2008. Expected response rate levels were summarized for different types of respondents and use of response enhancing techniques was coded for each study. First, differences in mean response rate were found across respondent types with the lowest response rates reported for executive respondents and the highest for non-working respondents and non-managerial employees. Second, moderator analyses suggested that the effectiveness of response enhancing techniques was dependent on type of respondents. Evidence for differential prediction across respondent type was found for incentives, salience, identification numbers, sponsorship, and administration mode. When controlling for increased use of response enhancing techniques, a small decline in response rates over time was found. Our findings suggest that existing guidelines for designing effective survey research may not always offer the most accurate information available. Survey researchers should be aware that they may obtain lower/higher response rates depending on the respondent type surveyed and that some response enhancing techniques may be less/more effective in specific samples. This study, analyzing the largest set of published response rates to date, offers the first evidence for different response rates and differential functioning of response enhancing techniques across respondent types.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 349
页数:15
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Aguinis H., 2004, Regression analysis for categorical moderators
[2]   MORE ON SELF-PERCEPTION THEORYS FOOT TECHNIQUE IN THE PRE-CALL-MAIL SURVEY SETTING [J].
ALLEN, CT ;
SCHEWE, CD ;
WIJK, G .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1980, 17 (04) :498-502
[3]   Journal impact factors and self-citations: Implications for psychology journals [J].
Anseel, F ;
Duyck, W ;
De Baene, W ;
Brysbaert, M .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2004, 59 (01) :49-51
[4]  
Applebaum H., 1986, ANTHROPOL WORK REV, V7, P25
[5]  
Baruch Y, 1999, HUM RELAT, V52, P421, DOI 10.1177/001872679905200401
[6]   Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research [J].
Baruch, Yehuda ;
Holtom, Brooks C. .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 2008, 61 (08) :1139-1160
[7]   A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE EVALUATION OF UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY RELATIONSHIPS [J].
BONACCORSI, A ;
PICCALUGA, A .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 1994, 24 (03) :229-247
[8]   INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF MAJOR RESPONSE FACILITATORS [J].
BRUVOLD, NT ;
COMER, JM ;
ROSPERT, AM .
DECISION SCIENCES, 1990, 21 (03) :551-561
[9]   ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF INCENTIVES ON MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATES - A METAANALYSIS [J].
CHURCH, AH .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1993, 57 (01) :62-79
[10]  
Cohen J., 2004, Applied multiple regression/correlation Analysis for behavioral sciences, V3rd