How to improve research quality? Examining the impacts of collaboration intensity and member diversity in collaboration networks

被引:93
作者
Liao, Chien Hsiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cent Univ, Dept Informat Management, Jhongli 32001, Taoyuan, Taiwan
关键词
Research quality; Social capital; Member diversity; Exploration and exploitation; Social network; KNOWLEDGE CREATION; EXPLOITATION; EXPLORATION; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-010-0309-2
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Better research quality not only inspires scholars to continue their research, but also increases the possibility of higher research budgets from sponsors. Given the importance of research quality, this study proposes that utilizing social capital (i.e., research collaboration) might be a promising avenue to achieve better research quality. In addition, as every scholar has his or her own expertise and knowledge, the diversity of collaborating members might be an extra resource for reinforcing research quality. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of research collaboration and member diversity on research quality, including the number of citations, the impact factor, and the size of the research award. To explore unknown associations, the author adopts two data sources, that is, the Social Science Citation Index database and academic database of a university, to verify the hypotheses. The results show that a higher intensity at which scholars are embedded in a collaboration network, results in higher research quality. However, member diversity does not seem to be a major concern during the organization of a research group. Research quality is not affected, regardless of whether a scholar collaborates with different or the same co-authors.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 761
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
[31]   Coauthorship dynamics and knowledge capital: The patterns of cross-disciplinary collaboration in information systems research [J].
Oh, W ;
Choi, JN ;
Kim, K .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2005, 22 (03) :265-292
[32]   Perspective factor a novel indicator for the assessment of journal quality [J].
Ohniwa, RL ;
Denawa, M ;
Kudo, M ;
Nakamura, K ;
Takeyasu, K .
RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2004, 13 (03) :175-180
[33]  
Oppenheim C, 2008, INFORM RES, V13
[34]   Social capital? [J].
Pawar, Manohar .
SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2006, 43 (02) :211-226
[35]  
Perretti F, 2006, ACAD MANAGE J, V49, P759, DOI 10.2307/20159797
[36]  
Petter S, 2007, MIS QUART, V31, P623
[37]   Influencing scientists' collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical human capital [J].
Ponomariov, Branco L. ;
Boardman, P. Craig .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (05) :613-624
[38]   COLLABORATION AND THE QUALITY OF RESEARCH [J].
PRESSER, S .
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 1980, 10 (01) :95-101
[39]  
REICHERS AE, 1987, ACAD MANAGE REV, V12, P278
[40]   Peering inside research networks: Some observations on the effect of the intensity of collaboration on the variability of research quality [J].
Rigby, J ;
Edler, J .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (06) :784-794