Cause-specific prevalence of bilateral visual impairment in Victoria, Australia - The visual impairment project

被引:155
作者
VanNewkirk, MR [1 ]
Weih, L [1 ]
McCarty, CA [1 ]
Taylor, HR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Eye Res Australia, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00554-1
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To study the cause-specific prevalence of eye diseases causing bilateral visual impairment in Australian adults. Design. Two-site, population-based cross-sectional study. Participants: Participants were aged 40 years and older and resident in their homes at the time of recruitment for the study. The study was conducted during 1992 through 1996. Methods: The study uses a cluster stratified random sample of 4744 participants from two cohorts, urban, and rural Victoria. Participants completed a standardized interview and eye examination, including presenting and best-corrected visual acuity, visual fields, and dilated ocular examination. The major cause of vision loss was identified for all participants found to be visually impaired. Population-based prevalence estimates are weighted to reflect the age and gender distribution of the two cohorts in Victoria. Main Outcome Measures: Visual impairment was defined by four levels of severity on the basis of best-corrected visual acuity or visual field: <6/18 <greater than or equal to>3/60 and/or <10<degrees> greater than or equal to5 degrees radius field, moderate vision impairment; severe vision impairment, <6/60 <greater than or equal to>3/60 and/or <10<degrees> greater than or equal to5 degrees radius field; and profound vision impairment <3/60 and/or <5 degrees radius field. In addition, less-than-legal driving vision, <6/12 <greater than or equal to>6/18, and/or homonymous hemianopia were defined as mild vision impairment. In Australia, legal blindness includes severe and profound vision impairment. Results: The population-weighted prevalence of diseases causing less-than-legal driving or worse impairment in the better eye was 42.48/1000 (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.11, 54.86). Uncorrected refractive error was the most frequent cause of bilateral vision impairment, 24.68/1000 (95% CI, 16.12, 33.25), followed by age-related macular degeneration (AMD), 3.86/1000 (95% CI, 2.17, 5.55); other retinal diseases, 2.91/1000 (95% CI, 0.74, 5.08); other disorders, 2.80/1000 (95% CI, 1.17, 4.43); cataract, 2.57/1000 (95% CI, 1.38, 3.76); glaucoma, 2.32/1000 (95% CI, 0.72, 3.92); neuro-ophthalmic disorders, 1.80/1000 (95% CI, 0, 4.11); and diabetic retinopathy, 1.53/1000 (95% CI, 0.71, 2.36). The prevalence of legal blindness was 5.30/1000 (95% CI, 3.24, 7.36). Although not significantly different, the causes of legal blindness were uncorrected refractive errors, AMD, glaucoma, other retinal conditions, and other diseases. Conclusions: Significant reduction of visual impairment may be attained with the application of current knowledge in refractive errors, diabetes mellitus, cataract, and glaucoma. Although easily preventable, uncorrected refractive error remains a major cause of vision impairment. Ophthalmology 2001;108:960-967 (C) 2001 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页码:960 / 967
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[21]  
THYLFORS B, 1994, WHOPBL9440
[22]   BLINDNESS AND VISUAL IMPAIRMENT IN AN AMERICAN URBAN-POPULATION - THE BALTIMORE EYE SURVEY [J].
TIELSCH, JM ;
SOMMER, A ;
WITT, K ;
KATZ, J ;
ROYALL, RM .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1990, 108 (02) :286-290
[23]  
Weih LM, 2000, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V118, P264
[24]   The prevalence of glaucoma in the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project [J].
Wensor, MD ;
McCarty, CA ;
Stanislavsky, YL ;
Livingston, PM ;
Taylor, HR .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 105 (04) :733-739
[25]  
*WHO, 1984, STRAT PREV BLINDN NA
[26]  
*WHO, 1977, ICD 9 WHO