The Child Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Teacher Telephone Interview (CHATTI): Reliability and validity

被引:64
作者
Holmes, J
Lawson, D
Langley, K
Fitzpatrick, H
Trumper, A
Pay, H
Harrington, R
Thapar, A
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Dept Psychol Med, Sect Child & Adolescent Psychiat, Cardiff CF14 4XN, S Glam, Wales
[2] Univ Manchester, Royal Manchester Childrens Hosp, Dept Child & Adolescent Psychiat, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[3] Cardiff Univ, Dept Psychol Med, Sect Child & Adolescent Psychiat, Cardiff CF4 4XN, S Glam, Wales
[4] Univ Manchester, Royal Manchester Childrens Hosp, Dept Child & Adolescent Psychiat, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
D O I
10.1192/bjp.184.1.74
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background The ICD-10 and DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for hyperkinetic disorder and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) require symptoms or impairment in two or more settings. Thus, information on children's symptoms in school is usually required. This paper presents the Child ADHD Teacher Telephone Interview (CHATTI), an instrument aimed at systematically obtaining this information. Aims To examine the stability, test-retest reliability and criterion validity of the CHATTI for children referred with a suspected diagnosis of ADHD. Method Data were obtained from 79 teachers, of whom 36 were interviewed on two occasions. Results Overall, the CHATTI shows good stability test-retest reliability and criterion validity for symptom scores. Test-retest reliability for some individual items was low. Reliability for the operationalised criteria of 'pervasiveness' (i.e. symptoms at school and home) and 'school impairment' was excellent (kappa=1). Conclusions The CHATTI appears to be a promising tool for assessing ADHD symptoms in a school setting and could be useful in clinical as well as research settings. Declaration of interest Work funded by the Wellcome Trust, Action Research and Sparks.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 78
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Achenbach T.M., 1991, MANUAL CHILD BEHAV C
[2]  
*AM PSYCH ASS, 1987, DIAGN STAT MAN EMTN
[3]  
ANGOLD A, 1995, PSYCHOL MED, V25, P739, DOI 10.1017/S003329170003498X
[4]  
Barkley R.A., 1990, Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment
[5]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[6]   Revision and restandardization of the Conners Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS-R): Factor structure, reliability, and criterion validity [J].
Conners, CK ;
Sitarenios, G ;
Parker, JDA ;
Epstein, JN .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 26 (04) :279-291
[7]   PARENT AND TEACHER RATINGS OF ADHD SYMPTOMS - PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES IN A COMMUNITY-BASED SAMPLE [J].
DUPAUL, GJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 20 (03) :245-253
[8]  
Everitt B. S., 1996, Making sense of statistics in psychology: A second-level course
[9]   A family-based and case-control association study of the dopamine D4 receptor gene and dopamine transporter gene in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [J].
Holmes, J ;
Payton, A ;
Barrett, JH ;
Hever, T ;
Fitzpatrick, H ;
Trumper, AL ;
Harrington, R ;
McGuffin, P ;
Owen, M ;
Ollier, W ;
Worthington, J ;
Thapar, A .
MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 5 (05) :523-530
[10]  
JENSEN P, 1995, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V52, P61